Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 23% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools, as reported by respondents, were focused on ethical dilemmas, conflict resolution, and why the interviewee chose the specific institution. Several respondents mentioned the interview being in MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) format, which included ethical-based scenarios, traditional questions, and possibly a nondisclosure agreement.
Students said most interesting question asked at University of New England - College of Dental Medicine discussed situational scenarios like working with a classmate, managing a 3-day weekend, and handling criticism during interviews.
Situation question about working with a classmate.
Students said most difficult question asked at University of New England - College of Dental Medicine discussed personal challenges outside academics, interpretation of the mission statement, stereotypes/biases, and challenges related to time limits and interviewer follow-up questions, potentially indicating an MMI format with nondisclosure agreements.
About a personal challenge outside of academics. And what a specific part of their mission statement means to me.
Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 5 or more people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as high stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had a closed file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by practicing with Kira questions, reviewing common MMI questions, watching videos on YouTube, reading forums, and reflecting on their application. They emphasized the importance of practicing responses, maintaining composure, and being familiar with ethical scenarios, as the interview format can include unexpected and out-of-the-ordinary questions.
As many have already mentioned, there's no way to know what they will ask since some were so "out-there" and weird. Just review some typical MMI questions and practice the way you respond to questions (i.e. pay attention to your composure, thought process, etc).
It is difficult to try and prepare for this interview since it is MMI style. It is closed file so you will not be asked specific questions regarding your application.
Applicants were positively impressed by the lack of cost with Kira, the facilities and clinical experience offered, the friendliness and thoroughness of interviewers, small class sizes and strong clinical experiences, updated resources, external rotations, and the warm and friendly faculty. The enthusiasm of students, the charming campus, and the new Oral Health Center were also mentioned as positive aspects.
Everyone was very nice. The students who gave the interview were very thorough and willing to answer any questions. All of the interviewers helped to make it a good experience and tried to make us as comfortable as possible. The professors were all willing to stop and give us a minute of their time . They also provided a goodie bag with helpful information, a water bottle, and other things with the school logo. They also gave us paper and a clipboard to write responses down during out prep time.
Applicants were negatively impacted by instances of poor interviewer behavior, such as being prevented from using a meaningful answer, experiencing confusion due to multiple interviewers, and feeling judged by the dean's response during a Q&A session. Suggestions include ensuring interviewers remain neutral, providing a more organized interview process, and fostering a more welcoming and inclusive environment for questions.
Nothing really - Kira was low stress compared to traditional virtual interviews.
There were slightly too many people interviewing at one time so it got a bit confusing. I got left in one interview room for longer than 10 minutes because they thought they knocked on my door.
During the last MMI station, the interviewer (faculty member) asked their question but before I was even allowed to give an answer they told me "Do not say ______ as your answer because I have already heard it so many times today." That did not sit well with me because: 1) I actually wanted to use that answer because it actually holds significance to me 2) it's highly unfair if others before me were able to use that answer, and I was singled out because I was the last station (and the interviewer was burnt out.) That obviously put me at a disadvantage because I had to think of an entirely different answer on the spot and I felt like I was not able to represent myself as strongly. With MMI, interviewers are supposed to stay neutral throughout the entire session.
Also during Q&A with the dean, someone asked a question along the lines of "I heard from a current student that some can graduate completing a lot more restorations than their peers - does UNE make an effort to somehow make it uniform so students can have more or less the same clinical experience?" Based on body language/response, it seemed like the dean was a bit offended/bothered since he said something along the lines of "patients should not be seen as a number/checkbox - if a patient needs XYZ doesn't mean s/he will get reassigned to another D3/4 solely because they need the experience" I don't believe the candidate meant any harm in the question (who actually thinks of patients as 'numbers'?) - I thought it was a very valid question and I was curious about the answer, too. His response could have definitely been delivered without the judgment/attitude.
Applicants commonly wished they had known more about the school's values and mission to incorporate into their responses, and that they had practiced physically writing down ideas during prep time. Additionally, many applicants desired more information ahead of time, such as the format of the MMI and a better understanding of the school from its website.
Not to worry! The questions were tough but use your prep time to physically write down ideas and brain storm.
UNE was one of the few schools that emailed an itinerary outlining the day, which I appreciated. But I wish they emailed the format of the MMI beforehand (6 stations, 2 min to read prompt, ~6 min to respond to prompt. You will have an empty sheet of paper, pen, and clipboard to jot down notes).
Applicants commonly found the pre-recorded Kira interviews impersonal and challenging to showcase their personality, with limited time for responses. Many appreciated the MMI format and suggested researching the school's values to prepare.
It was hard to just blankly answer questions and not gauge what the interviewer thinks or be able to elaborate on points they may want to learn more about. Plus it isn't easy to show your personality through KIRA as it would through a conversation with an interviewer.
The interviews were done through Kira this year due to COVID, and it was really uncomfortable, as the questions were pre-recorded and you only have 90 seconds to record your response.
The interview is MMI style, I tried to prepare for this interview but really nothing can prepare you for this style of interview. Look up the values of the school, and make sure you touch on them in you answers.
This interview is Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) style. Overall, I had a good experience and felt as if the interviewers could draw conclusions about my personality and values based on how I answered their questions. This interview style seemed fair.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggested reintroducing interviews, providing more updates for waitlisted students, improving the website, enhancing the interviewer training process for neutrality, offering detailed information on financial aid during interviews, and providing printed materials with statistics presented during information sessions.
I think going back to having an interviewer would be helpful. Also maybe reaching out with more updates for waitlisted students.
Sari in Admission is the sweetest person and is very helpful/responsive to your inquiries. Regarding the actual interview process, I suggest reminding interviewers to stay neutral and not have previous interviewees affect the current interviewee.
It would have been great to have a print out of the information that Dr. Ryder presented with all the statistics he showed about the school and program.