Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school as average compared to other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school below other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
Medical school applicants were commonly asked about their motivations for choosing pharmacy, how they perceive the field evolving, stress management techniques, and their activities in free time. Additionally, some respondents mentioned being questioned about their embarrassing moments and how they coped with them. Notably, discussions often began with feedback on the PharmCAS essay, indicating a thorough review process, possibly in an MMI format with potential nondisclosure agreements in place.
How do you think the field of pharmacy is changing?
They only had the PharmCAS essay, so they normally started with a comment or two on that. One lady told everybody who talked to her that that she didn't like their essay.
Students said the most interesting question asked at University of North Texas Health Science Center School of Pharmacy discussed family dynamics and personal perceptions, with an emphasis on how one responds to compliments.
Students said most difficult question asked at University of North Texas Health Science Center School of Pharmacy discussed various scenarios including describing a conflict with a coworker, proposing a solution to enhance healthcare collaboration between physicians and pharmacists, and addressing leadership experiences.
None of the questions were particularly difficult. Maybe leadership because I really didn't have any.
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents were neutral about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had a closed file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by reviewing common interview questions, practicing responses either out loud or by themselves, and revisiting their personal statements to reinforce their motivation for the position.
Applicants were positively impressed by the program's quality exceeding expectations, the supportive faculty and staff, well-organized schedule, and modern facilities despite ongoing construction. They appreciated the personal attention, up-to-date technology, and the overall welcoming environment.
The program seemed to be doing a lot better than I expected. It's in a health center so it seems like it will get accreditation.
Everyone was extremely helpful and very friendly. Even though the school is still under construction, I was very impressed by all of the up-to-date facilities and state of the art technology in place.
Applicants commonly expressed negative impressions of uninterested interviewers, disorganization in the interview process, overly casual or lax interviewers, and a lack of relevant questions during interviews. Suggestions included ensuring interviewers are engaged, improving organization to reduce stress for applicants, and providing more focused and meaningful interview questions to assess candidates effectively.
My professor interviewer seemed extremely uninterested.
There were times during the process that felt a little unorganized. You are basically running all over the different buildings finding out where you're supposed to be. They gave us a map though, which was nice. There were times when I was just waiting alone in a room just waiting for the rest of the interviewers to be done.
One of the interviewers was a little too lax. She didn't ask me questions that pertained to getting to know me, so I left the interview completely unsure of what she would have to say about me at the committee review.
Many applicants wished they had known ahead of time that their PharmCAS essay would be discussed during the interview and that interview styles can vary greatly. Additionally, they emphasized the importance of being prepared on what to bring and what not to bring to the interview.
That they were going to have our PharmCAS essay at the interview. Also, one of my interviews was very relaxed while the other was pretty stressful. I felt like they played good cop/bad cop.
Applicants generally provided positive feedback about the interview process, with some concerns regarding accreditation and faculty resources. They appreciated the welcoming environment and professional nature of the interviews, but expressed worries about the school's accreditation status and faculty recruitment.
Overall day was okay, but very disappointed that none of the students came and talked to us. We had a video tour, which makes it seem like they have something to hide.
I had 2 separate interview times with 2 different faculty members. One of them talked more about pharmacy and its importance. The other one just got to know me as a person (my family, my education, etc.). They were really nice though and made me feel welcomed. The whole interview process was fairly well-structured and professional given that this is only their second time. This is the only school that I applied to that wasn't accredited and honestly the things they said kind of scared me. First of all, they are only in pre-candidate stage. Yes I know that's just part of the process of becoming accredited, but I kept thinking... what if it doesn't get accredited on time like UCSD (if at all). They also said they were still in the process of finding faculty. Again just another normal part of the process, but what if they didn't find enough? What if they don't have enough rotation sites, etc. But honestly, I am very paranoid and these things just set off my paranoia alarm. UNT COP is part of the UNTHSC which is very well respected all throughout Texas with years and years of experience in other health-related fields. This means they have the technology, the reputation, and probably the money to bring this program to full accreditation in no time. So unless you're a paranoid freak like me, everything seems like it's going to be fine.
Overall it was a good experience. Everyone on staff there was extremely helpful and friendly and I didn't feel like I was under immense pressure to impress.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants have suggested that the admissions office improve their email communication by responding more professionally and thoughtfully. Additionally, there is a consensus among applicants that the admissions office should reconsider the use of virtual tours.
They need to learn how to properly reply to emails. I sent them a very well organized, formatted email and I got a very rude 1 line reply with no signature. Also, no more virtual tours please.