Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.
๐Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 30% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
Generally favorable experience overall, applicants reported positive interactions with some minor issues noted.
Based on 71 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was unfriendly.
No responses
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was unresponsive.
No responses
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The interview questions commonly asked at medical schools include scenarios testing ethics, discussions on alternative vs. traditional health care approaches, personal reflections on experiences in medicine, and decision-making scenarios like helping a failing classmate. Responses also indicated questions about research experience, allocation of funds in health care, and personal preferences related to the field. Some respondents mentioned a nondisclosure agreement related to the interview format, suggesting it might have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) where specific questions are not disclosed.
Alternative vs. Traditional Health Care approaches. Why is there tension?
Can't give specifics but it doesn't matter because next year they will be totally different! Just wait until you finish this interview, when you see the scenarios you will understand that the possibilities are infinite and they won't be repeated. Oh, and you will also see that your prep didn't help you at all!
questions about my research experience (I have an MSc), research related ethics questions, how would you fix the health care system, if you had 3 wishes what would they be
Students said most interesting question asked at University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine discussed the Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format with various scenario-based questions, including scenarios about patient confidentiality and autonomy. Some respondents mentioned being asked about personal topics such as regrets in life, views on alternative medicine, ethical dilemmas, and hypothetical patient interactions, indicating a diverse range of question types in the interview process.
Asked to describe what I saw in a picture! Wasn't expecting that!
It was all the most random scenarios I have ever seen. Honestly, there is NOTHING you can do to prepare for this interview. One personal question was asked but it wasn't any of the one's you would have prepared for or expected.
Students said the most difficult question asked at University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including ethical scenarios, decision-making, and personal values. Many mentioned encountering scenario-based questions typical of Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI), with some respondents noting nondisclosure agreements and vague or unexpected essay topics adding to the challenge.
What role can doctors play in preventing bullying in schools?
Should medical students give medical advice?
Four questions in a row that called for pretty much the same answer (what qualities make you a good roommate, what would you write in a reference letter about yourself, how would your friends describe you, how would your supervisor describe you). I think they were looking for consistancy.
How would I rank not only in importance but in terms of time management family/friends, my profession as an MD and my profession as a researcher. i.e. what would come first?? And how would I deal with the demands of researchers wanting me to be productive in the research field when I have a medical practice that is already very time consuming?
Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had an open file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for interviews by reading news articles, researching ethical and healthcare issues, reviewing their application materials, participating in mock interviews, and seeking advice from peers and professionals in the field. Many also emphasized the importance of staying informed, practicing relaxation techniques, and maintaining confidence in their preparation efforts.
went to mock MMIs, read websites, newspaper articles, took a bioethics course
Read the news, used this website, read my application and info on the school, prepared answers for common questions (huge waste of time!) I did everything I could think of to prepare and none of it helped me in the slightest! MMI's are very odd.
Read this site, thought about my responses to possible questions, glanced over the Romanow report, but basically just tried to relax and believe that if it's meant to be, it would go all right.
Read lists of possible interview questions, did practice interviews, read Romanow report, looked at CMA ethics guidelines, read a book on bioethics theory, checked out how residents are matched, interviewed MD's in the field I want to go into
I read the Kirby, Romanow, and Mazankowski summaries, talked to MANY residents, med students, physicians, found out a lot about the U of C program, and just tried to be as informed as possible on a wide variety of issues.
Talked to professors and other students, read the local papers and read the Romanow, Mazankowski and Kirby reports - summaries not the whole documents.
Applicants were consistently impressed by the friendly and enthusiastic students and faculty, as well as the welcoming and non-competitive atmosphere of the school. They also appreciated the modern facilities, the innovative interview format, and the accommodating admissions staff.
The students seemed really happy. They were also very enthusiastic.
The interview experience was great. I loved the MMI format - I felt it was a lot of fun and more ''objective'' than the traditional interview format.
the facilities are incredible...one of the benefits of having the premier of the richest province in the country live in your city. the students really loved the school as well
The admissions staff are fantastic. I had to reschedule my interview because I got sick and they were very accomodating. The students all seemed very cool too. It is a really relaxed med school with a team environment.
The students and faculty were soooo nice!! They can *really* sell their school!! The first year students seemed so well qualified... it seemed like everyone there was *at least* on their third degree - very interesting chatting with everyone.
Applicants commonly expressed negative impressions about the lack of information and preparation for the MMI format and on-site essays, as well as concerns about the curriculum structure and facilities under construction. Suggestions include providing more details about the interview format in advance, improving communication about the program, and ensuring a more welcoming environment despite ongoing construction.
The curriculum setup: 3 jam packed years with two 2 week holidays a year. The presenter at info session: a med student who spoke quite unprofessionally. The fact that you are not really informed about exactly how the MMI works and what is going to happen AND THE ESSAYS- worst experience of my entire life, so stressful! I couldn't even hear the guy giving instructions at the front of the room and all of a sudden about 100 people start typing as fast as possible and i didn't even understand one of the questions, I almost was in tears by the end.
the MMI format was wierd, i hadn't seen or heard enough about it beforehand to really be comfortable with it. also, close-file interviews didn't with specific stock scenarios made it difficult to incorporate all of my experiences into the interview
My interviewers didn't ask any followup questions and they were late. The student interviewer seemed extremely tired although this was a first interview. I wish they would have asked more probing questions instead of generic ones.
Gathering with all the other interviewees on the day of the interview - I didn't need to hear how wonderful all their other interviews at other schools had been!
Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the absence of faculty members at the interview, the different format of the MMI, the relaxed and casual nature of the interview, and the option to change into professional attire at the location. Additionally, some applicants mentioned feeling surprised by the differences between Canadian and American medical school interviews and emphasized the need to relax and not get overly worked up about the process.
That I wouldn't leave feeling like calgary is an amazing school - I interviewed last year at UWO and when i left I wanted nothing more than go to that school. I wasn't sold on UofC at all!
That I could have my interview and come back for the orientation and tour another day rather than having to cart all my good clothes there and change in the bathroom and spend all day sitting in the room with other stressed out applicants.
I was really surprised at the differences between the interviewees at Canadian med schools vs. American. They were a lot less stuffy and formal, and more talkative. They were also a lot less polished.
Applicants generally found the Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) process to be quick-paced and different, with a mix of positive and mixed feelings. Some appreciated the friendly interviewers and conversational style, while others felt the format lacked depth in assessing candidates. Stress levels varied, but many noted the importance of preparation and research for a successful experience.
The MMIs happened very quick! I was nervous, but relaxed a bit as they went on. I was pleasantly surprised that the interviewers were friendly and gave good feedback such as nodding, smiling and commenting. I wasn't expecting that!
I had a good time. I loved the interview. I found that I liked the school a lot more than I expected. After the first couple of MMI stations, I started to enjoy myself rather than being stressed out.
My feelings on this interview are mixed. The MMI format does not allow the interviewers to get to know you at all. Someone with no social skills would have soared through this interview! Unless they have discovered some secret way to truly analyze what should be analyzed in a med interview then I would say that it doesn't give them any indication of how you will behave as a physician. All you need to do is read the scenario and talk about every aspect you can think of - all common sense. I'm almost sure that every single person would have given the same response to these questions. The only difference would be word choice and the sequence they come out in.
it was good...not really sure how I did. it went by quite quickly, as the MMI was very much like a bell ringer. i felt a lot more stressful than I felt I should have. the essays were really weird (2x25min essays post-mmi)...good experience, have no idea how it went though...very difficult to tell
I felt like the interviewer kept trying to put words into my mouth. It was one thing to ask follow-up questions to clear up a point, but it's another to totally go off on a tangent about something I did not suggest in the slightest.
I really have no idea how I did. I actually think I may have been "too friendly" and not serious enough. Although they are supposed to be laid back interviews I feel a little grilling of people's reponses is a good thing and I had none of that.
My interview experience was awesome. I just felt like I was having a conversation with two friends. It was so low stress I couldn't believe it, but I guess I had a sort of low stress attitude going into it as well. They asked funny questions like "What is your favourite comedy and why?" I was surprised that for an open file interview, the interviewers didn't seem to know much about me. Maybe they chose to be that way to stay unbiased. My interview was over really fast, 35 minutes instead of 60, and in the end I got in so I guess in my case it was a good sign. Overall I had a really positive experience in Calgary.
I did a lot of research prior to the interview, which really helped. Especially knowing how residents are matched, having good understanding of what being a MD is really like in the real world, and understanding Canada's health care system. Overall a pretty good experience.
I had a young MD and a 3rd year interview me at the same time. They had my extracurriculars and my essay (admissions, not the onsite essay). All in all, it was not very stressed and very conversational. I had no ethical questions. By the way, I got in :)
Overall, not bad. This interview was the most stressful that I've had thus far (and I've had a few). The faculty member really tried to put the pressure on with some tough questions (to the point where the medical student looked a little shocked at his questions).
This was very relaxed and conversational in nature. Very few "standard questions" - Lots from my sketch and essay. Here is a list of topics/questions that came up:
-how would I feel if my patient was HIV + and didnt tell me
-recent dialysis error at foothills and mistakes I've made in my work and how I dealt with them
-euthanasia/end of life decisions
-good and bad aspects of their program (what I know)
-describe my research in layman's terms
-my strengths and weaknesses
-where see myself in 10 years
-if I was health minister, what problems would I tackle
The interviewers were very friendly and I got the feeling that they had a genuine interest in getting to know me. The majority of their questions were based on my autobiography.