Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.
๐Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 14% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did well.
Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.
Based on 261 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools, particularly in the MMI format where respondents may be subject to a nondisclosure agreement, include inquiries about the applicant's motivations for pursuing dentistry, defining moments that led to choosing dentistry as a career, strengths and weaknesses in dentistry, ethical considerations, challenges faced in life, and future aspirations within the field. Additionally, questions about personal experiences, leadership activities, research background, manual dexterity, academic history, and extracurricular interests are frequently explored to assess applicants' suitability for dental programs.
Because it's MMI, we are not allowed to disclose what specific questions were asked. I will say that they are impossible to prepare for, and also impossible to "fail." Everyone is in the same boat as you. I believe that the purpose of MMI is to level the playing field for all the applicants, regardless of stats/background info.
Describe leadership activities you have participated in. Why did you get that low DAT score? How did you prepare for the DAT? Why did you attend so many colleges?
Students said most interesting question asked at University of Washington School of Dentistry discussed a variety of topics, including comparing healthcare systems, reasons for choosing a specific school, contributions to dentistry, opinions on universal healthcare, and manual dexterity demonstrations. Many responses mentioned an MMI format with a nondisclosure agreement, while other common themes included personal interests, professional goals, and societal healthcare challenges.
Why do you think dental services are inaccessible to certain groups? Why are there underserved/raral areas? I'm not sure of the exact phrasing but it was a question somewhat like this.
In response to the question, "what do you do that shows manual dexterity?"...when I gave my answer, one of the interviewers somewhat humorously asked, "well, are you good at it?"
You have the seat next to you open on the plane ride back home. You can choose one person in history to sit next to you and have a conversation, who would you choose? Why? explain? (No religious figures or family)
Students said most difficult question asked at University of Washington School of Dentistry discussed various topics such as describing oneself in adjectives, justifying low grades, predicting the future of dentistry, handling ethical dilemmas, and proposing changes to the dental system. Many responses referenced MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) format and potential nondisclosure agreements, with questions ranging from personal reflections to scenario-based inquiries related to dentistry and leadership.
Tell me about the defining moment you decided on dentistry: I told them it was a series of events that led me here but they abruptly cut my answers short.
Say someone looked online at some faulty information regarding Xrays and Fluoride, and refused to be treated with them. How would you treat this patient?
What do you want us to know about you? Tell us about your family, your schooling, and how you became interested in dentistry.
(Not a terribly difficult question, but very open-ended. Hard to know where to start.)
If you were made head of a health board that was given $100,000,000 to deal w/ oral health care in underserved populations in the US, what would you do?
You have been appointed head of dental care for the USA and are given $200,000,000 to solve the problem of poor populations being underserved. What do you do with the money?
What three traits/qualities do you bring to the UWSoD? (I kinda stumbled on this one because I wasn't expecting it to be three...thought it would be only one, but it wasn't that bad)
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had an open file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants primarily prepared for the interview by researching the school through its website, using Student Doctor Network (SDN) forums for potential questions, conducting mock interviews with peers or career counselors, and reviewing their application materials. Many emphasized the importance of being familiar with the school, practicing answering questions in a conversational manner, and being prepared for a variety of scenarios to feel more confident during the interview.
Made a list of potential questions and wrote keywords as to how I would answer them (so I don't sound scripted). Read the school's website and talked to other students.
Wrote down answers to all the interview questions I could find from google searching.
Mock Interview with a career center counselor.
Mock Interviewed with my brother and his friend. Had them give me snide remarks and poker faces. Prepare for the worst and the real thing should be a breeze.
1)Read school information on the internet
2)Read-up on dental procedures on the ADA website
3)read over my AADSAS application and secondary application for UWSOD
Applicants were consistently impressed by the friendly and welcoming atmosphere at the school, the genuine interest and friendliness of the faculty and staff, the strong reputation and quality of the program, the revamped curriculum to prepare students for future dentistry, and the smaller class sizes. Suggestions included emphasizing the school's strong points, maintaining the positive and relaxed interview environment, and continuing to showcase the supportive and encouraging faculty and staff.
Everything about the school. It was very professional, and I was very impressed with the Dean and his thoughts about the new curriculum. Most of the dental students I interacted with were extremely friendly and happy to answer questions. Great facilities and a great program. Their reputation is truly stellar, and their school lives up to it.
The faculty and staff are genuinely friendly and very attentive to applicants. It's clear the student body and faculty have a mutualistic relationship that has fostered a warm and cheerful culture throughout campus. The curriculum has recently been revamped in an exciting way to account for recent advances in biomedicine and technology, and to better prepare students for the future of dentistry. There was no attempt, or need, to "sell" the school to applicants. UW's reputation precedes it, making it very attractive to the majority if applicants.
The organization of the interview day was great. We always had something to do and were really introduced to every aspect of the dental school. The student tour was also great. In the sim lab, all of the dental students were very friendly and seemed genuinely happy that we were there.
The interviewers seemed legitimately interested in who I was and what I was about. The clinical facilities are very nice. There is an incredible amount of opportunities for research and extracurricular involvement at UW. The faculty seems to be absolutely top notch and committed to providing a world class clinical education. You don't have to be involved in research but if you so desire, there aren't many schools that will present better experiences. The RIDE program looks great too and I would highly recommend looking into it. Smaller class sizes is also a plus, as is the quality of student at the school
The building really wasn't as bad as I thought, and the students and faculty members there were all very friendly. The level of competition between students depends on the class; the 2nd year student who took us on the tour said that there wasn't really any competition in her class.
They have great National Board results, and you could apply for in-state after one year. Plus Seattle is a great city
The faculty and staff were incredible. There have been posts about the school being 'full of themselves' but I didn't see that at all. In fact, I saw quite the opposite! They were wonderfully attentive and very encouraging.
The great reputation the school has, the high National Board I & II results, the happy and content students, the newly renovated sim lab, the small class size of 55-63 students, the faculty and administration, etc. It's an excellent program!
The environment, the faculty and the students. Everyone that we encountered on the tour was happy to be at UW and thought it was a excellent place to be.
Everyone was very friendly and helpful. Students seemed happy to be there. Facilities were above average, but not quite top notch. The whole day was very organized and informative.
I've always been impressed w/ the asst. dean Dr. Stiener. Seattle is an amazing city. The dental students really seemed to be enthusiastic about their school.
The interviewers reminded me that, "I wasn't in an interrogation...and that I should just relax because they just wanted to get to know me."
The admissions office staff including Kathleen Craig, Dr. James Steiner, Molly, Ms. Brown and the woman at the desk were all very kind and helpful.
The students were very nice...most offered me their email addresses and a few D-3/D-4 students asked if I wanted to follow them around the clinic.
My interviewers, Dr. Toolson and Dr. Maebo we're very amiable and after the interview, Dr. maebo asked me to shadow him during his restorative clinic session, where he introduced me to lots of students and Doctors and walked me through lots of procedures that the students were doing.
1.For 2003, UW placed 2nd on Part II, and 5th or 6th on Part I of the Boards.
2.16 students in the class of 2003 were accepted to residency programs (17 applied)
3.Major emphasis in developing competent hand skills
4.I like all the students...most are very easy going and well rounded.
5.The faculty that I have met are very supportive and encouraging but push you to be the best you can be.
6.UW is a major research instution
7.Location (Seattle is an amazing city)
8.UW is nearly as competitive as Harvard to become accepted, yet UW only chooses students from Washington state and the WICHE program whereas Harvard chooses from the entire nation. For the class of 2007, UW had an overall GPA of 3.68 and DAT scores were a 21 AA, and a 19 PAT. Harvard had an overall GPA of 3.7 and DAT scores were a 22 AA, and a 20 PAT.
9.Small class size of 55
10.The dental school is in the Health Sciences Building and next to the UW Medical Center which means the dental students are surrounded by other students in the health professions and science disciplines.
11.The grand total with in-state tuition is $135,000!
Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the high cost of living, outdated facilities, unbalanced student gender ratios, poor interview experiences, lack of diversity, and inadequate tours. Suggestions included updating facilities, improving interview processes, increasing diversity, and enhancing the overall student experience.
Parking on campus is expensive, but the city and area offers plenty of alternatives to driving. Still, cost of living in the area is relatively high with few low-cost options.
The school is updating its curriculum and, unfortunately, we will only use it for the last two years of our time there. This is a very, very minor concern, however.
The facilities are old and not in great shape, walking around the building is like walking through service corridors in a 50 year old hospital. The actual clinics and sim clinics are very nice and have the latest technology, but the rest of the facilities are old and it shows. There also appears to be a patient shortage recently for the D3 (especially) and D4 clinical students, as well as probable upcoming tuition hikes.
Felt out of the loop when some applicants knew staff/students and i didn't (try and get to know staff, etc, even if it's just over the phone or email!)
Interviewers. Here's the thing, even though people are given interviews I strongly believe the interviewers know who they want and who they do not want BEFORE the interview, period. I felt like they weren't interested in me and asked me a lot of dumb, non-dental related questions. What a waste.
Nothing serious, just that there are on average only 17 female students out of 55, and not very diverse. But this is just a personal thing; I like 50-50 and diversity.
They have no international externship opportunities for students - only regional. Not a big deal though since students can find their own externship opportunities independently.
Nothing. Maybe the student lounge; could use some new furniture. How can they expect us to go there to relax if the all the couches look over >90 yrs old.
Basically everything else. The interviewers were extremely rude and told me that their school was a tier 1 school and that if by chance I get an invite to another school for an interview, take it because that may be my only chance. I just felt like it was a lecture on why I didn't deserve to be in their school.
Everything. The facilities are old. It feels like you are in a cave in that building. There are pipes running around everywhere. The lighting is poor. It's just dark and cold and eerie. All of the students were stressed out and hating life.
The day was poorly structured. Nobody seemed like they had conducted interviews before. We didn't have access to any current students, aside from the DS1 who led our tour. Also, the facilities are not impressive.
Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time that the interview process would be more laid back and less intense than expected, and that remaining calm is essential. They also mentioned the importance of arriving early to orient themselves and navigate parking challenges, as well as being prepared for potentially biased or hostile interviewers.
The admissions office has a very orchestrated and organized process, and those invited to interview are provided adequate details regarding the visit. Everything else can be found on their website. There were no surprises come interview day.
The exact location. Don't worry though, if you look the slight bit lost in the dungeon-like maze, people down there will see you and ask you if you need help. :)
This is minor, but I wasn't aware that the school would be interviewing 15-20 students the same day. It seemed like a large group. I just expected a smaller group based on previous interviews. However it worked out well. We were divided up into groups A, B, C, and D.
I didn't really feel as though I was caught off-guard by anything. They give you a handout at the beginning of the day that lays out the day's activities, so you know what to expect throughout the day. I had heard that UW interviewers like to ''grill'' applicants during the interview, so I guess I wish I had known that they would be much more laid back and friendly. I didn't feel uncomfortable at all.
Our interviewers were encouraged not to answer some of our questions that pertained to the school. Instead we were supposed to use our time with the dean for this. The dean explained that the interview should be focused on us, not the school.
That they already have their minds pertty much made up when you get there. Also- if they give you a parking pass, ask where you can park with that pass. The parking attendant said that my pass was invalid for the lot where I was instructed to park, so I had to pay $30.
Applicants generally found the interview experience at UW to be relaxed and conversational, with interviewers focusing on getting to know them as individuals. Many appreciated the welcoming atmosphere, emphasis on community outreach, and the school's commitment to training dentists for underserved areas. Some expressed concerns about lack of diversity among students and suggested more detailed tours of the facilities.
Definitely interact with your peers! They're all as nervous as you are. Be supportive of one another and don't be shy. I feel like making friends before the interview made the whole thing much less nerve-wracking.
Overall I was very impressed, though there were some negative aspects, they weren't anything likely to really impact the quality of education you receive.
Great school with high faculty to student ratio and so many extra curricular activities and outreach programs available to the students. Many research opportunities as well.
Stop wasting applicant's time by ONLY giving out interviews that they are TRULY interested in having. If you look at the class population, majority of them are rich kids, their parents are doctors or some kind of professionals....Not much diversity really going on. I felt really out of place since I wasn't one of them.
I like the school very much. They only have about 2 or 3 seats for out-of-staters, so I'm not getting my hopes up. But if by some miracle they accept me, I will definitely go there.
It was great. The students seemed to love the school and so did the faculty. Everyone was proud of their school which leads me to believe that the school is as good as its reputation implies. And, being an undergrad at UW, I know from experience that the school's reputation is not just heresay.
It was EXCELLENT. The school lived up to every expectation I had. It's a great program. The faculty is there to help the students succeed. the students are all very happy and close with each other. THE UW cares about their community. There are several outreach community service programs for students to participate in. You don't have to be a RIDE student to make a contribution. I can't even put into words what a wonderful school UW SoD is. :)
They ask a lot of questions that are designed to get a sense of who you are and how you will fit into the upcoming class. I don't think they asked why dentistry or why do you want to go to this school (pretty standard at other schools). The questions were more aimed at getting me to sell myself and my positive qualities. What sets me apart, what will I bring to the field, what leadership qualities do I have, etc. They also will ask lots of questions about your personal statement and other aspects of your application.
I got there early so I wouldn't be stuck in traffic. I sat in the waiting room with all the others to be interviewed. There were two different sets of interviewers. My individual interview lasted 40 minutes. It was very low key. They just wanted to know more than stats and what was on the paper.
It was a very positive experience. My interviewers were thoughtful, and highly experienced in the field. Also, they were knowledgeable about the problems as well as outreach necesities in our community and deeply caring.
Seriously, I found UW to be a wonderful school with nice facilities, great faculy, and happy students. The interview is nothing to be stressed about at all. You really are just letting the interviewers know who you are as a person. The only thing that was slightly negative about the entire experience, was the fact that I sort of got lost in the basement of the Magnusun Health Sciences Center when I was trying the find the Admissions Office the night before the interview. Other than that, the interview was great and I would be very excited to get in.
It was very relaxing and enjoyable experience. The interviewers didn't ask anything difficult, just really an opportunity to chat for 45 minutes. It was more a personality test/communication skills test than anything else.
The interview was very conversational. The interviewers really wanted to know more about me and fill-in some gaps in my application. They wanted to know what I cared about and why I cared about it. I didn't feel like I was being tested.
Endurable; was glad when it was over. All the stress was my own doing though. Like I said, my interviewers so extremely nice; they were very jocular and talkative and were constantly trying to put me at ease. However, they didn't spare me the 20 questions though. They asked many questions; standard ones but still lots of them. However, I was somewhat prepared so nothing caught me too off-guard. Be prepared to answer everything you put on the personal statement. My interviewers combed that thing.
My interview was very relaxed. Dr. Rafferty and Dr. Toolson were very kind, and had definitely spent time reviewing the information in my file. Mostly they asked questions about things I had talked about in my statements.
I had a cold and was on Sudafed so my memory is a little hazy. The interview went about 10 minutes long. (Is this a good thing?) I felt pinned down by the questions and don't feel that I performed that well. I think they were looking to see how I work under pressure. I'm usually very good at interviews. The rest of the day was great! The students were informative and loved the school, Dr. Steiner (a dean)was eager to talk to us and the tour of the facilities got me excited. Don't listen to those who say the building is old. The equipment and facilities are great. I will definately go here if they'll have me.
I thought the interview went by so quick. I left thinking I didnt say all that I wanted to say about myself. The rest of day was great though. As a group we talked with the dean for almost an hour. It was wonderful. The tour was great. The sim lab was very cool. Top notch equipment. Each student has their own chair in the clinic which will be completely digital starting next year. Students seem to love the school.
Interview at the beginning, then meeting with the dean of admissions as a group, fafsa meeting, the lunch and tour.
The admissions commitee meets on Thurs. and I they you that day if you got in.
sorry, just to add on...
Starting this year, the students will start to take anatomy one month earlier than all other courses, so they can focus their energy on the course, and also have more time for other courses when they take them. I haven't heard of any other school that does this.
UW emphasizes community outreach, which I think is a very good thing; they set aside time for students to do volunteer works. Also they want people who will be willing to serve in the underserved areas, and they will ask you about that too, so be prepared.
All in all, this is a great school. I get the feeling from some other schools that they consider dentistry more like a business rather than a noble profession. And they just want people who will do well on tests and make the school famous. UW seems like a school that doesn't really care about all those other stuff; they just want to train people who will remain in Washington and help out those underserved regions there.
It was great, not a lot of stress. Kathleen called two hours after I left with a notice of acceptance, so that was excellent too! Oh yea, the interviewers were not faculty, but alumni that practice in Washington.
The interview was very relaxing. I truly don't remember any specific questions... maybe "how did you manage to do all you stated on your app.?" We also talked about the other schools I applied and why I was interested in one particular over the other ones. The last thing they asked is "tell me what you would like us to share to the committee about you". From the moment I walked in, to the end of our interview the time just flew by since we just talked and talked. It was relaxing, welcoming and very friendly. I also was interested in finding out info. from other students and I was able to stop a couple of students who were walking around about their experience. I heard very positive experiences. I also checked out students in the sim-lab and in the clinics and they seemed to be enjoying their time.
I read the review just before mine, and I don't understand how that person could have felt that way...maybe they had a tougher pair of interviews and that soured their experience from the get go...?
I am really hoping to get into UWSOD!
I had a good time the process was very relaxed and comfortable. The interviewers made sure to make you feel welcome. I showed up and had my interview, later the group of five other applicants ate lunch with students and went on our tour of just 3-4 rooms, not a lot of explanation. I would have liked to se more. Late we as a group met with the asst. Dean and had a helpful and good conversation about what the school is looking for in the future and the type of care it is looking to provide and some tidbits on dentistry. That summed things up and we were let go.
I had a great time at my interview. My interview was not stressful and my interviewers were friendly, sincere, and easy to talk to. It seems like the UW really wants well rounded and highly intelligent students in the dental school. The interview experience does not have that "car sales man" feel.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Most applicants praised the admissions office for their welcoming atmosphere and smooth process, while highlighting the need for better management of interviews and a preference for electronic communication over traditional mail for confirmations.
Poorly Managed Interviews. They do not follow schedules and timelines. They are all over the place and very unprofessional. The staff was friendly though and teachers looked knowledgeable