SDN Logo
 
 

William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Hattiesburg, MS

Osteopathic Medical Schools | Private Non-Profit

Faith-Based

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 38% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a low stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the candidate's motivation for pursuing medicine, specialty interests, ethical scenarios such as patient confidentiality, qualities of a good doctor, leadership experiences, and reasons for choosing a specific medical school. Some respondents mentioned being asked a variety of questions related to why they want to be a doctor, why they are interested in osteopathic medicine, and why they selected a particular institution like William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine (WCUCOM). Notably, several responses hinted at an MMI format, potentially involving nondisclosure agreements due to the nature of the questions asked.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said the most interesting question asked at William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine discussed a variety of topics including ethical dilemmas, comfort levels in professional settings, and personal experiences related to medicine. Some respondents mentioned questions about providing birth control to minors, handling ethical scenarios at parties or in medical settings, and their fit with the institution's mission, while others were asked about their leadership, volunteer experiences, and knowledge of the school and its location. Some responses indicated the interview format may have been an MMI, and respondents might have been under a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine discussed ethics scenarios, including handling situations like physician-assisted suicide and blood transfusions based on religious beliefs. The interview may have been in an MMI format with nondisclosure agreements, focusing on ethical dilemmas, commitment to practice, and academic scenarios like GPA and MCAT comparisons.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 3 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

The most common feedback and suggestions shared by applicants on how they prepared for the interview include practicing common questions, using resources like Student Doctor Network (SDN) and mock interviews, researching the school and its mission, reviewing application materials, and ensuring a good night's sleep and relaxation before the interview for a confident and authentic performance.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness, kindness, and professionalism of the interview staff and current students. They appreciated the welcoming and conversational atmosphere of the interviews, as well as the genuine care and enthusiasm displayed by everyone they encountered throughout the process. Many were also positively impressed by the school's integrated curriculum, facilities, and commitment to providing primary care physicians to underserved areas.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed negative feedback regarding outdated application forms, lack of interviewer engagement and feedback, unenthusiastic interviewers, and insufficient information provided about student life and campus facilities. Suggestions included updating application processes, improving interviewer rapport and feedback, and enhancing campus tours to provide more comprehensive information about the school and its amenities.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known more about the interviewers' research interests, that the interviews were not as stressful as anticipated, and to arrive early for interviews. Additionally, many applicants mentioned feeling nervous unnecessarily and emphasized not stressing too much about the interview process.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the interview experience at the school to be welcoming and relaxed, highlighting the friendly and kind nature of the staff and students. However, some expressed varied opinions on the facilities and overall impressions of the school, with a few feeling underwhelmed compared to their expectations.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggest making the application process online-only and more streamlined, while also recommending more flexibility with letter of recommendation requirements.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by Admissions staff personnel

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 2-3 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as average
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

Based on the responses provided, it is not clear where the users stayed. Therefore, the most common location cannot be determined.

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2023-24 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good In Person
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average Virtual
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2021-22 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good Virtual
2021-22 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average Virtual
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2021-22 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good Virtual
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2020-21 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2020-21 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A