Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.
Based on 110 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
Applicants commonly reported being asked about their attributes, reasons for choosing pharmacy over other health professions, strengths and weaknesses, ethical dilemmas faced, and their views on current healthcare issues and the role of pharmacists in solving them. Some responses indicated that the interviews were MMI format, possibly involving a nondisclosure agreement due to limited details shared.
Use 3 adjectives to describe yourself and explain why.
Describe a current issue with the healthcare system and how do you think pharmacists could solve it in the future? This question basically tests how well you keep up with the news and how much you understand about the pharmacy profession.
You talked about community pharmacy, are there othere areas of the field that you are interested in?
What can you bring to the field as a professional?
Students said most interesting question asked at University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy discussed a variety of topics such as defining pharmacy, unique roles in pharmacy, ethical problems in the field, past mistakes, and personal interests like hobbies. Some responses indicated a focus on personal reflections and decision-making processes, while others mentioned more general and basic questions.
Do you have any mistake or missed opportunity in the past that you could've benefited from had you not chosen to miss out on it? This question was kinda confusing to me at first, but all it really means is "Do you have anything you wish you could've done differently?" The follow up question for this was then: "Do you regret any of your past mistakes" or something along that line.
Students said most difficult question asked at University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy discussed a wide range of topics including personal opinions on the healthcare system, defining pharmacy and its future use, unique roles in pharmacy, integrity scenarios, and challenging decision-making situations. Some respondents mentioned a structured series of questions in an interview format, possibly indicating an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) setup where nondisclosure agreements may have been in place.
Seeing your personal experience dealing with it, what is your opinion on the healthcare system? Do you think it is a fair system for everyone?
If I didn't prepare ahead of time, it would've been: "Define pharmacy and how you will use this definition in your career as a pharmacist in the future."
All the questions were asked in a series as a structured form. One interviewer asked three questions and the other asked three with responses in between
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had a closed file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by studying sample questions on platforms like Student Doctor Network (SDN), practicing with family and friends, researching the school and current pharmacy issues, and reviewing their application materials and program information. Many emphasized the importance of staying calm, relating answers to pharmacy, and engaging in mock interviews to feel more prepared.
studied questions from this site. also, read a few current issue articles about pharmacy
The interview itself was a conversation. It did not feel like an interview at all. So calm your anxieties and just be open. Don't forget to relate what you're saying to pharmacy though, that is the reason why we are there!
Had a panic attack (j/k)...read a bunch of SDN interview feedbacks...practiced with family and friends...got some really good advice from a pharmacist...had a good time to reflect on all of my answers and a good breakfast + coffee the morning of the interview.
I prepared a list of questions based on those other students listed on this site, and I researched the current pressing issues in pharmacy by talking with pharmacists, reading newspapers, journals and searching the web.
Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness of the staff, faculty, and students, as well as the beautiful campus and facilities. They appreciated the well-organized events, the tight-knit community feel, and the direct communication about the interview process. Suggestions for improvement were minimal, with only one applicant expressing a negative experience with the interview process.
Everything. The event was organized extremely well. The facility is very new and high tech. It is connected to the medical school and library through an indoor bridge. The faculty was beyond impressive in their research and speaking skills. Everyone was supremely nice and the Pharm D.program at Madison just seems like it is simply the best.
I'm impressed with how tight-knit of a community the whole pharmacy school really is. It felt almost as if everyone's a big part of an extended family to each other. The pharmacists who interviewed me were also very cordial and nice. The friendliness of everyone there has left me with a very positive impression of the school.
All the faculty, students and interviewers are very friendly. The interviewers are local pharmacists that volunteered their time to interview us. The admissions coordinator is extremely friendly and helpful, contact him if you have questions or need help.
The admissions advisor is very quick and friendly. The campus is absolutely beautiful. The experience was extremely informative and provided a plethora of information
although the day was long, about 7:30-12, I learned so much about the school and curriculum...the students and professors were so helpful and enthusiastic about their school
The building was nice and the interviewers were super friendly. The were really interested in getting to know me. The admissions coordinator is the best! He gets back to you on time. The scheduled events went as planned. They don't surprise you with anything. They let you know exactly what you're going to be doing that day.
NONE! This interview was completely pointless. I think they spent more time printing out the interview packets than actually having a quality interview with the applicants.
Applicants commonly expressed frustration with lack of interaction with faculty, closed-file interviews, rushed schedules, absence of campus tours, and non-academic interviewers. Suggestions include incorporating faculty/student interaction, more informative interviews, providing tours, and ensuring a smoother, less rushed interview experience.
No interaction with faculty members. The interviews were closed-file and very formal/structured. The on-site writing sample was tedious, especially given the number of initial application essays.
The fact that it was closed file was a little frustrating. I spent so many hours on the admission essays and I had to basically repeat them to the interviewer. Also, there was no tour, which would have been nice considering I traveled from out of state for this 1.5 hour total interview.
The interview process was pointless and the tour was a waste of time, especially for a school that prides itself on it's program and it's name. The interview was a complete waste of time. The school decided to interview everyone who applied, probably to eliminate applicants who did not want to travel to the interview. They only asked 2 questions, one was suppose to be ethical and one situational. The interviewers were not even staff members, they were pharmacist from around the state volunteering their time. It just seemed like the school didn't want to know ME, they didn't even ask anything relevent to who I was or why I would be a good or bad applicant to their program.
Many applicants wished they had known more about the interview format and process in advance, such as the brevity and structure of the interviews. They also expressed a desire for more information on what to expect during the interview day and the importance of preparing questions for interviewers.
The interview day did not provide much additional information about the program. Admission and scholarships applications are separate (5 admission essays + 4 scholarship essays = 9 total essays!)
That everything you told them about yourself and the small talk you were doing wasn't going to be considered into the interview. They were there to ask you 2 questions and they were going to rank you from 1-5 based only on those 2 questions. Your interview was a number with a few notes given to the committe. The interview was mandatory even though your grades could have guaranteed that you would have never gotten into the school. I really don't understand that approach, but I am glad that I didn't travel far to get to the interview.
Applicants generally expressed positive feedback about the interview experience, highlighting aspects such as the well-organized day, friendly staff, and the school's desirable qualities. Some suggestions included improving the essay portion by allowing computer typing, providing clearer expectations for interviews, and enhancing opportunities for interaction with faculty and staff.
So pleased with this interview. Madison quickly became my first choice after the visit.
If you have any question, Jeremy is such a great resource to get your answers from. He's very responsive and his emails are hilarious! With the holistic method of assessing applicants at UW, I felt honored to be selected even for an interview since it shows that at least my application fee's not being spent on someone who'll treat me like a list of stats. In terms of the interview day, I thought the hardest part was the extemporaneous essay portion. We were given with only 25 minutes to complete 2 essays (everyone's split up into different groups and rotated through different parts of the schedule) and I was barely done with my first essay when there was only 5 minutes left. I wish we could've done it on a computer coz now I don't even know if my handwriting's even legible..lol. If you're an out-of-state applicant, stay at the Best Western Inn towner since they have an excellent free shuttle service + free breakfast + complementary late check-out. The staffs there are supernice and accommodating!
The interview day was well organized and efficient. The beautiful facilities and the academic/professional strengths of this program make it very desirable.
The school of pharmacy made every effort to make the interview successful. You could talk to students about anything. There was a nice informal question and answer session with a thrid year pharmacy student.
Overall it was really positive. Once I realzied the interviewer had no idea of my background, I really got into that. But it was still hard to think that he had no idea of who I was when I got into the room. It was a beautiful building, but a guided tour would have been helpful.
You check in and they give you a packet. You can complete an essay before or after your interview. Interview was 30 minutes with 2 community pharmacists. There were refreshments available.
A waste of time. I don't understand why they just did not do phone interviews. Also, I had no idea what they were ranking the interview on since they didn't care to know anything about me or what I've done or how I could have contribute to their school or even why I wanted to go to pharmacy school.
I was not impressed with the interview process at the University of Wisconsin or their administrative personnel. My invitation to interview indicated their would be "opportunities throughout the day to interact with faculty and staff" and yet there were no such opportunities whatsoever. There was no welcome from the dean, no student panel, an no opportunity to interact with anyone but the office personnel. And as the interviewers were alumni from 20+ years ago, they were of little help in providing up-to-date information regarding the program. The school offered one tour of their new building but it was scheduled during my interview time. Instead, I was given a self-guided "hand-out" to take the place of the tour. I was incredibly disappointed in the school's lack of attention given to the prospective students, as well as the lack of respect shown to students who travelled a distance in hopes of learning more about their institution.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants generally praised the admissions office for its communication and responsiveness, particularly mentioning the helpful updates and promptness of the director. Suggestions included providing a longer break for lunch during admissions events and offering a timeline for making admission decisions.
None! Everything was simply perfect. Except, maybe include a longer break for lunch. It was a long day and I got really hungry about halfway through.
I really admired the thorough updates that the director of admissions (Jeremy Altschafl) has sent out to us applicants. He's very responsive and has done a good job at keeping us in the loop of things.