SDN Logo
 
 

University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Ottawa, ON

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 8% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was unfriendly.
No responses

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was unresponsive.
No responses
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the applicant's motivation for pursuing medicine, their personal qualities relevant to being a doctor, challenges faced in life, and unique contributions they can make to the program. Some respondents mentioned being asked about their knowledge of current events, experiences related to healthcare, and self-reflection on negative influences regarding a medical career. Additionally, references to MMI or Multiple Mini Interview format suggest a structured interview process where respondents may be subject to a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine discussed various topics such as banning certain things, ethical dilemmas, patient communication scenarios, and personal influences. The interview format may have been an MMI based on the diverse range of questions, and respondents may have been subject to a nondisclosure agreement due to the nature of the questions asked.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine discussed a range of topics including leadership, human cloning, ethical dilemmas like euthanasia, and reasons for choosing medicine over other professions like nursing or physiotherapy. Additionally, some respondents mentioned encountering challenging follow-up questions and discussions on ethical scenarios, hinting at a Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format where nondisclosure agreements may have been in place.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 40 - 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 3 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a in a group interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had a closed file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by conducting mock interviews, researching current events and ethical issues, practicing with friends, reading newspapers and school materials, and reflecting on their motivations for pursuing medicine. Many also sought guidance from current students, participated in interview workshops, and engaged in introspection to articulate their strengths and weaknesses.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were consistently impressed by the friendliness of the staff and students, the advanced technology integrated into the curriculum, the organization of the interview process, and the positive and relaxed atmosphere of the school. Many highlighted the enthusiasm of students, the professionalism of the interviewers, and the overall welcoming environment of the institution.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants were generally disappointed by time constraints leading to rushed experiences, disorganization during tours, lack of engagement or personal attention during interviews, and missed opportunities to interact with current students. Suggestions included extending the schedule, improving organization, and ensuring interviewers prioritize attentiveness and communication with candidates.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the relaxed atmosphere, the potential questions about current events, and the low level of stress. They also mentioned the need to be prepared for ethical questions and the importance of thinking quickly and logically during the interview.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the interviews to be positive experiences, with friendly interviewers who focused on getting to know them personally and assessing their critical thinking skills. They emphasized the importance of showing their true personalities, knowledge, and problem-solving approaches while staying confident but not arrogant.
  • It was a good first and only interview for me. I put a lot of effor into preparing, was focused and not nervous. In an afterthought, i think I could've done better if i was more alert and thought more carefully, but given the situation i've done my best
  • Really great ppl, calm and very fun to talk with. You get in, you talk about personal stuff. They want to know you. You get out...Easy as that...but its up to you how well you present yourself.
  • I loved it. The interviewers really wanted to see how you ticked. they asked simple questions and seem to watch not only wat i said but how i said it. their reactions after i answered questions were also very honest. if i said something they weren't impressed with they would hint it with their facial expressions. Time passes quickly in an interview. make sure you show them who you really are. personality and knowledge and critical thinking. show them how you think through problems (ethics).
  • All were very friendly. I was quite nervous for the first few minutes, but settled in and relaxed quickly.
  • I thought a few of my answers were not so good and left feeling ambivalent.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

No responses
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are in state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 4-6 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Des Moines International Airport (DSM)
No responses

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Friends or family or with friends or family.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

Days Inn

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses