Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.
👋Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 36% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did well.
Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.
Based on 110 responses
Score Reference:
9–10 Exceptional8–8.9 Very Good7–7.9 Good6–6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
Positively (94%)
No change (6%)
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
Great (53%)
Good (37%)
Average (11%)
What are your general comments?
Applicants generally appreciated the friendly staff and students at the school, but some expressed concerns about the surrounding area. Feedback included expectations about interview questions, the structure of the interview day, and positive impressions of the program's faculty and resources, highlighting the potential of the university's program.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
In general, the staff and students say the best thing about the school is how people there are genuinely nice. Personally the area seems very sketchy and ultimately I wouldn't go to the school because of that.
I thought because it was a closed file interview that the first question they would ask is tell me about yourself or why optometry, but the first question was give me an example of a leadership role. It was a short interview and i left it wishing i could have spoke more. Also there were no follow-up questions to any of my responses.
After the interview, everything is a breeze. You'll get a presentation on curriculum and financial aid. Afterward is the pre-clinic tour with staff and campus tour with students. You get to eat lunch with students too. Eat breakfast before and wear comfortable shoes!
I didn't really consider WUCO to be one of my top choices, but after the interview/tour it is definitely up there. If it weren't for the newness of the program, it would be my No. 1 pick.
WesternU's program looks exciting and well-crafted. The faculty and students that we met with were awesome and very helpful. One of our guides stayed with us after the whole thing was over and showed us anything we wanted to check out.
After my day, I was definitely positively influenced by the presentation and enthusiasm of the staff. They are a young program at Western, but they are not short of resources, direction, and performance. Has potential to be one of the top and most unique programs in the nation.
WUHS-OPT-COMP interviews are an average of 33 minutes, with an average of 2 interviews. 89% of interviews are one-on-one, 100% are in-person, and 89% are closed-file. Of the in-person interviews, 100% are held at the school.
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiring about strengths and weaknesses, leadership experiences, overcoming obstacles, handling challenging situations, displaying creativity in problem-solving, and going above and beyond to achieve goals. Responses suggest a focus on assessing interpersonal skills, resilience, leadership qualities, and ethical decision-making. Some respondents may have experienced an MMI format with potential nondisclosure agreements in place.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Students said most interesting question asked at Western University of Health Sciences College of Optometry discussed various topics including communication skills, study habits, accomplishments, transition to optometry school, personal interests like soccer and travel, and handling patient inquiries about refractive procedures. The interviews seemed to focus on behavioral questions, with some personal inquiries based on responses, rather than specific unique or intriguing questions.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Do you have a church in ____? (I had just been talking about my volunteer work at my church at home, they were asking if I had been able to find a church near my university, since it's far from home)
The interview questions themselves were behavioral, but afterward they might start asking personal questions based on how you answered. Like for me, they asked me what I like to do in my spare time and I said I liked to travel, so they asked me what was the most beautiful place I've been to.
Most applicants prepared for the interview by researching behavioral interview questions on platforms like Student Doctor Network (SDN) and Google, practicing their responses with family members or through mock interviews. Many emphasized the importance of having 2-3 relevant experiences ready and adjusting them to fit different questions during the interview.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Googled "Behavioral Interview Questions" and did a little bit of practice. Pretty much just be prepared with 2-3 experiences, and adjust it to fit with the question during the interview.
I googled behavioral interview questions and just tried to reflect on some of my personal experiences. Honestly, there's not much you can do to prepare...
Students said most difficult question asked at Western University of Health Sciences College of Optometry discussed various behavioral-based questions, with a focus on personal experiences and interpersonal skills. Some respondents mentioned challenges with questions related to convincing others, showcasing creativity, and reflecting on meaningful volunteering experiences. There were no specific mentions of MMI or nondisclosure requirements in the responses provided.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
List one of your most meaningful volunteering experiences and how it impacted you.
Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness, enthusiasm, and helpfulness of the staff and students they interacted with during the interview process. They found the facilities to be modern, well-equipped, and conducive to learning, and appreciated the conversational and welcoming atmosphere that helped alleviate stress during the interviews.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Campus was nice, on campus housing was really nice, faculty very friendly. I liked that the interview was at the beginning of the day, then we toured around.
They are working very hard to get accredited. They spend a lot of money to get the best technology for classroom and lab. Also, I love the idea of 4 houses competing for the class cup (think Harry Potter) and having a second year be your buddy
The friendliness and enthusiasm of the staff and students. They really take the stress off your mind and are so accommodating. Also, the new facilities are clean and cutting-edge. The optometry school and eye care center are new too. It's nice to know I'll be learning and working in a nice and clean environment. Plus, they actually offered lunch and snacks this year!
Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the negative portrayal of the school area by student ambassadors, issues with Zoom meetings kicking them out, short and seemingly unimportant interviews, and perceived lack of accreditation and externship opportunities. Suggestions included improving campus security, addressing the unappealing surroundings, and reducing the duration of interview days.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
The student ambassadors didn't really paint the school area in a positive light (dangerous area). I asked about if the area was dangerous and their response to me was to not be stupid and drive to places I need to be instead of walking.
My interview was three questions and was only 20 mins long. I felt like the interview portion of the day was the least important part to them. It is a behavioral type of interview and it was mostly just conversation between us, but I really got the sense that they were more or less just selling the school to us.
I wish they were accredited and had more developed externship sites. I would so go here. I assume security in the area is not great. So many security guards!
Compared to the optometry school, the area itself doesn't seem very nice and doesn't look like it offers much to do either. Also, the classrooms and clinics are all painted in white...a little hard on the eyes after a while.
Applicants commonly wished they had known about the importance of preparing questions for the start of the day and having an itinerary beforehand to understand the schedule better. Additionally, many applicants mentioned a desire for more information on the location of the HEC building and how to approach behavioral interview questions.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Have questions prepared for the beginning of the day. Interview is one of the first things that will happen once check in.
That they were really innovative and thinking outside to box to provide the best education and experience. I can see them being successful in the future. Just not now
Nothing. They are very straight-forward about what to expect. The day was pretty long though (7:45AM-1PM), but after the interview it goes by pretty quickly.
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How would you rate the Location and Cultural Life?
0 = Low, 10 = High
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants generally praised the admissions office for their positive impact on the school's reputation and suggested improvements in communication, such as providing a detailed itinerary before interview day and addressing email responsiveness issues.
It'd be nice to get an itinerary of the day beforehand so we can get an idea of what we're going to be doing on interview day. For example, I didn't know lunch was going to be offered so I brought a bunch of food with me and had to carry it around all day.
33% interviewees used ONT (ONT), with 22% using Ontario (Ontario) and 11% using ontario (ontario) and 11% using LAX (LAX) and 11% using ont (ont) and 11% using I used Long Beach but because it was closer to my aunt's house. (I used Long Beach but because it was closer to my aunt's house.).
What was your primary mode of transportation?
Most interviewees traveled by airplane to the interview.
✈️
63% Airplane
🚗
38% Automobile
🚆
0% Train or Subway
🚲
0% Other
Hotels Recommended by Other Interviewees
Most interviewees stayed at the Comfort Inn (average ranking 6.3/10), with some staying at ontario grand inn and suites (average rating 10/10). (Top 3 displayed)
🏨
Comfort Inn
6.3/10
🏨
ontario grand inn and suites
10/10
🏨
Hampton Inn Chino Hills
9/10
What was the cost and time spent traveling?
Cost: Low Cost to High Cost
What is your in-state status?
Most respondents are in state students.
Where did you stay?
Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.
Who was the tour given by?
Tours were most commonly given by a Student
Admissions staff (12%)
Faculty member (24%)
Student (65%)
How did the tour guide seem?
Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.
Enthusiastic (82%)
Neutral (18%)
All Responses
Loading responses...
No responses found.
Application Cycle ▿
Impression
Performance
Interview Location
Success!
School has been added to your favorites.
AI Advisor
Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.