Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the applicant's reasons for choosing the specific institution, experiences in volunteer work, support systems during education, responses to unfair treatment, influential figures in the field, involvement in community service, personal attributes for the profession, and motivations for pursuing pharmacy as a career. Some respondents also mentioned being asked about their impact on the world and whether they would work during pharmacy school. Notably, some responses indicated an MMI format, potentially involving a nondisclosure agreement.
1st interviewer asked me
1. why Belmont?
2. any volunteer during college?
3. do you have any support while attending pharmacy school?
When was a time you saw someone was treated unfairly and what you did/thought about it?
Who is someone who is influenced you in the pharmacy field and gave you support?
The interviewer only asked me one question: "Why is this world a better place because of you?" He told me that he didn't care to ask any other questions because he had already looked at my file. It caught me off guard and I stumbled a bit. Two months later, I found out that I got waitlisted.
Students said most interesting question asked at Belmont University College of Pharmacy discussed various topics including envisioning themselves in the future, views on the healthcare system, essential pharmacist skills, personal experiences related to family, and reasons for pursuing pharmacy. The interview style appeared to be conversational and focused on getting to know the candidates authentically, with no specific scenario or situational questions mentioned, indicating a more relaxed and natural dialogue format.
who will support me while I am attending pharmacy school especially I have a 2 year old kid?
All questions were very conversational. There was zero situational/scenario questions with prompts. Questions that really help them to determine if you're a good fit for the school. They wanted to make sure you was being yourself and that you didn't come into the interview acting like a robot.
How many nieces and nephews do you have? (She asked me this because I told her I like to babysit my nieces and nephews as a hobby.) How many siblings do you have?
It was hard to distinguish individual question because it was a very casual interview. I had given her a copy of my resume and she basically asked me about my experiences as she read through my resume.
The interview was mostly just back and forth dialogue. I didn't have the feeling of being interogated like other schools make you feel. Very relaxed interview, they want to get to know the real you, not just your canned responses.
Students said the most difficult question asked at Belmont University College of Pharmacy discussed handling difficult situations at work, managing stress, and addressing academic challenges. Additionally, some respondents mentioned an MMI format and a nondisclosure agreement, suggesting the possibility of encountering questions related to specific scenarios and ethical dilemmas.
If you are not doing well in a class, what would you do? Did you follow through with what you said and if so, explain in details (I told her I get into study groups and I spoke with my professor)...I had to think for a few seconds to try to remember the details.
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 1 person.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had an open file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Most applicants prepared for the interview by conducting mock interviews, using resources like Student Doctor Network (SDN) for feedback and practicing common interview questions. Some applicants also relied on prior interview experiences and researched the school and interviewers beforehand to feel more confident and prepared.
Went over the talking points for the basic questions: why pharmacy, why belmont, why you, and what were the important items I wanted them to remember about me.
I used SDN to prepare for my first two interviews. After that I was very prepared and did not feel the need to refer back. I practiced in front of a mirror which helped.
I had 2 prior interviews with other schools. I read the Belmont website for basic info and during the interview greeting, I used my phone to check my interviewer profile.
Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the beautiful campus, welcoming and friendly faculty, new and modern facilities, strong curriculum, and the upcoming new pharmacy building. They also appreciated the positive and organized interview process, the school's affiliation with Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and the opportunities provided by the location in Nashville.
Faculty and staff made it very clear that Belmont and Nashville can provide so many opportunities and successes. They truly care about how their students succeed.
The campus is really beautiful, probably one of the most beautiful that I have ever seen. The new pharmacy building is currently under construction and will be finished in fall 2010.
The location and the campus. The campus is absolutely beautiful. It feels very homey and I loved their facilities. The COP will be getting an addition of a new building which will consists of research laboratories and classrooms.
They were more organized, professional, and more welcoming than some of the "top" programs I interviewed at. They are a new program but have solid faculty members and I feel will offer a better education than some other long standing institutions. They also have an affiliation agreement with Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Also, they are building a beautiful new pharmacy building. Aaaaaaaand they seem to have very successful undergrad, business, and muti-health profession programs so I'm confident that they will progress to full accreditation.
The campus is small but it's extremely clean and I absolutely loved the architecture. The campus is beautiful and it's not crowded so you shouldn't have any problems finding places to go study.
Belmont is in the process of building a new pharmacy building (ready in 2010) so I'm expecting great things from this program. It's a new program but they should have no trouble getting fully accredited.
All the faculty members including the Dean were so freindly; the university hosted the 2008 presidential Debate, and it has gym, nice basketball court, indoor mountain climbing..
Applicants were negatively impressed by factors such as unengaging interviewers, lack of information on financial aid and expenses, lack of diversity, and issues related to accreditation. Suggestions include improving interviewer engagement, providing comprehensive information on financial matters, increasing diversity, and expediting the accreditation process to address financial aid limitations.
the interviewer was very old and very dull. very boring as well. not very engaging with me.
It was upsetting to have prepared so much for the interview only to be stumped by one question, which was the only question that I was asked during the 20 minutes that I was interviewed. Because I was only asked one question, I didn't have the opportunity to tell the interviewer why I'm so passionate about pharmacy, why I wanted to go to Belmont, what my experiences have been so far in pharmacy, and what I wanted to do with my Pharm.D. Therefore, since I didn't have an outlet to answer any other questions, I felt like I didn't have a fair opportunity to show the interviewer who I really am as a person, and I strongly feel that that was what cost me the acceptance. I'm not saying all of this to be bitter, but I just want other candidates to be prepared in case they are interviewed by the same guy and is asked the same question. None of the other candidates were asked that same question (in fact, they all were asked several of the typical questions that you'd expect in a professional interview setting).
They don't seem to have as much energy as the first time I was interviewed there back in late April. Maybe it was because school was still in session and they were busy.
Since not fully accredited you can't get enough Stafford loan money to pay for tuition. This problem will fix itself once the school is fully accredited.
Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time that the interview process would be more relaxed and laid-back than expected, with lunch being a significant part of the evaluation. They also mentioned wanting more details about the essay topic and the overall ease of the interview at Belmont University.
that the lunch portion was actually a good chunk of the interview. they don't tell you but i am pretty sure they grade you during the lunch.
Applicants generally commented positively on the interview experience and the school's potential, mentioning the importance of being oneself, staying professional, and engaging during interactions. Some mentioned concerns about the admissions office and accreditation status, but overall felt the school had good facilities and potential growth in reputation.
just be yourself during the interview and dress professionally and be on time.
Had the interview on Thursday may the 13th and I got my acceptance letter on Tuesday the 18th.
Wonderful facilities, great location (not from Tennessee), and great students! As the school grows its reputation it will be a great pharmD program.
Be sure to stay on the admissions office as they definitely are not there to help you!
I was accepted but the admissions office was a top reason why I decided to attend elsewhere. As I could not be sure if this was an admissions office issue that continued through the culture of the school or not.
good time, not too stressful, make sure to remain 'poised' during the lunch portion with the faculty and students, as I believe it functions as a small portion of the evaluation process
Although the program is unaccredited, it still seems like it has a lot of potential to be great. Also, if you plan on staying at a hotel, make sure to stay at the Hutton. If you book your flight and hotel through Orbitz, you can actually get a pretty sweet deal.
After the initial interview and tour we had a lunch with 4-5 other interviewees, 2 faculty members and 1 current pharmacy student. Some students didnt talk much and kept to themselves. Try to be casual and make good conversation. They have your names and I believe it serves as a part of the interview process.
My interview was very easy. I wasn't asked anything out of the ordinary and I thought it was more conversational than anything. My interviewer was awesome and I had a blast at the interview!
The essay prompt that I had was different from the one that the one who filled out the interview feedback had before me. It was nothing like the essay prompt for the PCAT so don't stress out!
I really liked the school and the program. The Dean of the Pharmacy program used to work at Vanderbelt so there is a strong tie in there. I'm intersted in clinical work, not just trying to collect a check at Walgreens. I think this school, although not fully accredited yet, will make a big splash.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggest that the admissions office should improve response times to emails and phone calls, provide better communication timelines, and be more reachable for inquiries. They also praise the helpfulness and professionalism of the admissions staff once contact is established.
Pro - fantastic people and very willing to help once you get them.
Con - To provide better timelines when the student reaches out to you for communication. No response to e-mail or phone follow ups for 3 days or more is unacceptable from an admissions office.
The admissions office was pretty slow to respond. It took them several weeks before they responded to me, and I had emailed them and called them several times.