Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.
๐Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 15% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.
Based on 81 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the impact of COVID-19, reasons for pursuing the field, ethical dilemmas such as euthanizing healthy animals, preparation for exams, family support for studying abroad, experiences in specific veterinary settings, and personal statements. Some respondents mentioned questions related to specific diseases or aspects of the veterinary profession. No mentions of MMI format or nondisclosure agreements were provided in the responses.
Students said the most interesting question asked at University of Glasgow School of Veterinary Medicine discussed a range of topics including changes in the veterinary profession, historical equipment preferences, intriguing cases, relaxation methods, and opinions on emerging diseases. Additionally, some responses hinted at an MMI format with possible nondisclosure agreements in place due to references to sensitive questions and statistics.
What would you change about the veterinary profession?
Students said most difficult question asked at University of Glasgow School of Veterinary Medicine discussed a wide range of topics such as the biggest issues in the veterinary community, transitioning from private practice to corporations, opinions on zoos, the use of technology in historical contexts, and controversial subjects like animal research. Additionally, some responses suggested the interview format might have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) due to mentions of nondisclosure agreements and a variety of questions covering different areas of interest and expertise.
What is the biggest issue that the veterinary community is facing?
Do you feel that Biomedical Engineering (BE) is over used in the US and what do you think the implications are? (I was probably asked this question since my interest is veterinary public health)
They asked me to describe the electromagnetic spectrum and discuss the diagnostic tools associated with each level of radiation and also how the mechanism for the equipment worked.
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had an open file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at another location.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by practicing common interview questions, reviewing their application materials, researching the school/program, and reading interview feedback. Many also focused on specific topics like disease, zoonotic diseases, and issues relevant to the UK.
Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness, approachability, and welcoming nature of the interviewers. They appreciated the relaxed and comfortable atmosphere of the interviews, feeling like they were having a good conversation rather than being quizzed. Some also highlighted the supportive student community and the understanding and sincerity of the admissions office.
The people who interviewed me were very nice and they responded to what I was saying
Applicants overwhelmingly expressed that there was nothing that negatively impressed them during the process. They found the experience overall positive and did not have any major concerns or negative aspects to highlight.
Applicants commonly wished they had known that the interview focused on their personal experiences and opinions rather than specific materials, suggesting they would have prepared differently. Other common themes included advice on transportation and the importance of showcasing their personality during the interview.
I wish I had known that the interview was really all about me and what I had to say. I wouldn't have wasted so much time studying materials since the interview revolved around my application.
Applicants generally found the interview process to be conversational and laid-back, with a focus on being oneself rather than memorizing facts. They appreciated the friendly and organized nature of the interview, and found it to be a positive experience overall.
The overall interview was very fairly laid back. They asked questions that I had not really prepared for (most of my questions were fairly medical in nature) but I felt I handled them well. Both Ms. Wason and Dr. Sullivan were very friendly.
The experience was very positive,it was great to meet people from the UK. They were really organized and quick to send out invitations to interview. They did a great job setting up a website for info about their school and being an international student.