Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school as average compared to other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most rank this school as average compared to other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
💬 Interview Questions ▼
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include scenarios related to ethical dilemmas like handling cheating among friends or classmates, inquiries about the applicant's knowledge of the field of study (e.g., pharmacy areas and roles of pharmacists), as well as questions about long-term career goals and reasons for choosing a specific institution like Howard University. Responses suggest that some interviews were conducted in an MMI format, potentially involving nondisclosure agreements due to the nature of the questions asked.
What is Pharmacy to you? I did bad on this question because I misunderstood the question. They meant "Why do you want to be a pharmacist?" Or "what motivated me to want to become a pharmacist?"
Besides Howard Univ, what other pharmacy schools did you apply to? How will you rate Howard Univ amongst all the other pharmacy schools you've applied to? If all of the pharmacy schools you've applied to accepted you, where would Howard Univ stand?
If there is only one seat left why should we pick you over any other student.
Question 4: How will you handle a case where you work in a team/ group and some individuals are not "performing"
Students said most interesting question asked at Howard University College of Pharmacy discussed scenarios like handling cheating friends, peer evaluations impacting grades, and convincing why they should be chosen for the last spot. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview), as some responses hinted at nondisclosure agreements due to the unique and situational questions posed by the interviewers.
How do you have time to do everything? (I think this came up because I work a full time and a part time job, go to school full time, and volunteer A LOT)
You are in a group where one of the members was not involved with preparation but showed up to the presentation and caused your group to get a B. You must peer evaluate them and the grade you give them determines if they pass/fail for the semester. What grade would you give that person?
You are in a class where everything is done in a group. If you were to evaluate one member in your group at the end of the semester who did not work very hard, and you know your evaluation can make or break their grade, how would you evaluate him/her?
If you worked at a job where there was a very excellent worker that you didn't like and a worker that wasn't so great that was your friend and evaluations were being done and one of the three of you would have to go if job performance did not improve, what would you do?
Students said most difficult question asked at Howard University College of Pharmacy discussed the challenge of justifying their candidacy for a single remaining slot or dealing with ethical dilemmas like catching a classmate cheating. The interview format seemed to include Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI), with some respondents hinting at nondisclosure agreements.
Why should we choose you if there were only one slot?
If they were 75 seats in this class why should you get the 75th? She asked 3 times everytime I responded the interviewers countered like well this candidate is smarter than you etc. I think she was trying to get a rise out of me.
What qualities do you have that would make you successful in the program? They basically want you to brag about yourself, which I am not good at doing.
If you saw a classmate cheating, what would you do?
I am not a huge fan of ethics questios because the nervous tension of the interview can cause you to deviate from your natural answer. However, my advice is to answer honestly.
What is Pharmacy to you? (Again, Do NOT misinterpret this question!) They are asking why you want to become a pharmacist!!! (They are not asking you to give the definition of Pharmacy)
If you were in a group working on a project and one of your group members was your friend and he most of the time didn't show up in group works and /or didn't participate very well, if you were to evaluate the members of the group, what do you do..?
I wouldn't say there was a difficult question. But their were big ones. "What do you know about pharmacy?" is probably the biggest one they asked.
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the area’s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What are your comments on where you stayed?
No responses
✅ Interview Preparation and Impressions ▼
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Most applicants prepared for the interview by conducting mock interviews, researching the school and interview questions, utilizing resources like SDN forums, and seeking advice from current pharmacy students or alumni. Many emphasized the importance of knowing why they want to pursue pharmacy and highlighting their unique qualities and experiences.
SDN, class material on nutrition and different disease states (I'm a nutrition major and I was preparing for the question--what makes you different than the other applications/why should we pick you?)
I prepared for this interview by reviewing this forum closely. I also reviewed various pharmacy programs to see what Schhols generally look for. I also spoke at length on several occasions to various pharmacists including those who graduated several years (17 yrs ) ago and even recent graduates. My brother-in-law is a recent graduate from the University of MD Pahrmacy Program. He used to interview for the program and his knowledge was very helpful. MAke sure you know exactly why you want to do PHARMACY. Make sure you know why you applied to HOWARD. Make sure you highlight your leadership ability abd community service.
1. I made sure I knew the formalities of interviews (dress attire, handshakes, eyecontact.)
2. I did research on the school and on pharmacy current events. I made sure I knew what pharmacy was all about.
3. I'm not the type who is good at spontaneous speeches and the like. Therefore, I came up with possible questions, so that I could answer them extemporaneously.
4. Know why you want to pursue pharmacy (Most important!)
Applicants were positively impressed by the diversity of the campus, the friendliness of students and faculty, the emphasis on resources and student empowerment, and the well-organized and enthusiastic admissions process. Many noted the welcoming atmosphere, professional staff, and the convenient location of the school, as well as the rich history and positive energy of the students and faculty. Some also appreciated the opportunity to meet other candidates and the information sessions that helped calm nerves before the interview.
I loved the diversity of the campus. I loved that the bulletin boards showed lots of evidence that the school provides information for the students to prepare for the NAPLEX and succeed. The new drug facilities are marvelous. The people I encountered in the interview were friendly and very kind.
How much the students enjoyed being at Howard and them discussing all of the opportunities the school has given to them. One of my interviewers was a Howard Pharmacy School Alumni
The location of the school and the adcom seemed interested in my answers and in being there, which is more than I can say for many other school I interviewed at.
They were well organized, interesting and friendly. I read many negative comments about the university but I actually proved it false. They are very good people. I want to join the University. They impressed me a lot.
-The rich history of the school.
-The enthusiasm of the tour guide and the students that we came across
-The individuals who work in the admissions office and the Professors we came across were very , very, very friendly. They seemed to want you to succeed.
DC has a really good transportation system. You can get to Howard by Metro or light rail. I never had to take a cab the whole time I was there, not for going to the school or sightseeing.
The enthusiasm of the students and faculty members (including alumni). Both faculty members that interviewed me were Howard alumni and they had nothing but good things to say about the program.
I liked how we got to meet other candidates for the school of pharmacy. (We were in groups of about 15). Having the information session and question session with pharmacy students, really calmed us down before the interview.
Applicants were commonly unimpressed by disorganization in the interview process, outdated facilities, lack of maintenance, unprofessional behavior from staff or faculty, and the overall negative atmosphere created by these factors. Suggestions include improving organization, maintaining facilities, ensuring professionalism in interactions, and enhancing the overall experience for applicants.
I just did not like starting off wrong by being given the wrong time to arrive.
i was interrupted multiple times by the professor who was interviewing me. several times i did not get to answer the questions and was led to the next question. i could see them grading me which did not help with my 'answering of questions'. i wished it was one-on-one.
The school is old and looks it. Some construction. Not very technologically advanced. Budget cuts have caused them to be short staffed in offices so responses are slow. We were told we could find out about acceptance/denial anywhere from one month to 6 months after our interview.
Everything ran really late. This may have been because I was part of the first interview group of the year. People that were in interview groups hours after mine were interviewed before me because they didn't allocate enough time for the interview. Note.. if your interview is at 1pm and you know its going to take 2-3 hours, you are not going to make a 4:00 flight. (this wasn't the school's fault, applicants should have planned accordingly). We didn't really get a tour.
The interivew was repeated interrupted and at one time he come in, he forgot what he asked me. I was very dissapointed. As of 05/02/I have never know about the decision of the interview.
The pharmacy school is in a really run down building. The facilities are quite old, but it's understandable because Howard is an old school with a very long history.
-The interview process / protocol was EXTREMELY disorganized.
- What should have been a very smooth process must have been a very stressful process for the admissins office to coordinate.
The school is very old and you can see the smaller classrooms are really rundown. They're on probationary status right now, so they're working on renovating the labs. The surrounding neighborhood looks a little sketchy. Once you leave the premises, you'll know it.
The facilities were run down, didn't seem like much had been updated since the main building was established in the 50's. Also, the accredidation of the program was placed on probationary status by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. When I asked faculty/staff members about this, they seemed to shrug it off like it wasn't that big of a deal - definite negative.
The person I was to report to when I got to the school ignored me for about 5 minutes before getting to me, then told me to go to the wrong room and wait. After waiting I went back down and she blamed it on me and said that I must have been late. I finally got to my group and the facility was old and not as nice as others I have been in. Then the math exam that we were required to take was missing a page. And finally the interview was conducted by 2 faculty members at the same time which did not put me at ease at all. Overall it was a pretty sucky experience.
Many applicants wished they had known more about the interview format, specifically that it was a closed-file interview and the types of questions they would be asked. They also mentioned wanting more information about the school itself and practical details like the length of the interview process and what to expect during their visit.
I wish I had known it was a closed file interview.
That the math quiz was so easy. I was stressed out about it but it is literally cross multiplying fractions, a few VERY basic derivatives, and adding and multiplying decimals... Oh and converting, mg, g, kg and such. Very simple math...
How to interpret the question of "What is pharmacy to you". REMEMBER - This means, why do you want to be a pharmacist, or how can you make a difference being a pharmacist.
Some of the ways they were going to ask interview questions such as being drilled hard on the pharmacy experience line of questioning, and that the interview would be closed-file.
the metro exit is only a few blocks from the school, so i shouldn't have taken the bus after getting off the train and the one-day pass starts at 9:30am and the trains stop running at 12am... oh yea, and I should have brought a resume with me
I was in my heels for about 4-5 hours and it was really painful. I wish someone had told me that I can wear tennis shoes, then change into heels when I got to the school or something.
That the interview was one-on-one, b/c the email told me there would be a "meeting with two faculty and/or alumnus from the School of Pharmacy".
Applicants generally expressed positive impressions of the Dean, alumni, and students at the school, as well as the program's facilities and traditions. They appreciated the friendly atmosphere, ease of the math test, and the opportunity to interact with current students during the interview process. Some feedback highlighted areas for improvement, such as better organization, clearer communication regarding timelines for decisions, and more efficient processes.
I really was impressed with the Dean, the alumni and students we interviewed with and met. The facilities and traditions of the school are great. If you want a great school to prepare you to work in a diverse work world then this school is a great choice.
Overall, I was impressed with Howard's program. The associate dean even called to follow-up later in the week after my interview. DC is a great place to be, especially if you are interested in working for a federal health agency.
The atmosphere was amazing. From the interview and tour I felt like this would be the best place for me to attend school. Also, this school has some of the best professors in the field of pharmacy which is a plus.
Overall I thought it was a good interview process but I did get the feeling that the process as a whole is a little bit disorganized beginning with the long speech from the secretary about how she is a one-person team. Also, it would have been nice to have a clearer idea of when we would have some time of decision (yes, no, waitlist) from the admissions committee. The secretary said it could be a few weeks or a few months from now, depending on when the admissions committee meets next. The math test was really easy and there was plenty of time given. The test was on basic math, roman numerals, word problems, like 1 derivative and 2 or 3 integrals. But the 4th year students were really nice and seemed like they had little to no complaints about their experience at Howard.
Overall, this is my number one pick just based on location, (DC is a nice city) however because of the lack of technology and disorganized process I am starting to reconsider.
show up ahead of time because the pharmacy students will be there early and you get to talk to them about their experiences at howard and how their first year was. They are all really open an honest about everything so it was really interesting, funny, and enjoyable listening to what they had to say.
Ladies- wear flats. I took the Metro in from MD and the station is several blocks from the school. Other applicants that drove said parking was difficult. I was nervous about the math test but it wasn't difficult. Just remember to brush up on derivatives. I was accepted to this program and got my letter about 6 weeks later. Feel free to PM me if you have additional questions.
The tour was great and the math test was really easy. I was a little nervous at the interview and stumbled over a few words. I don't care how prepared a person can be...once you get in there, sometimes you draw a blank. Other than that I think everything went well.
I figure it went as well as it could have. It was interesting though that one of the interviewers looked very uninterested in being there, at times he would close his eyes for a good 5 seconds while you were talking to him as if he wasn't paying any attention. The other interviewer was very friendly and nice though. The questions more or less followed that of SDN feedback, the only differences being follow-up questions based on exactly how you answered.
Despite the negative posts I had read on this site about Howard, I was overall positively impressed. The staff was friendly and well organized and the interview went as scheduled. They really have a good Pharmacy program that just need a makeover. I asked about the low Naplex scores and was happy to hear the many programs and prep courses that have been put in place to correct this. I would attend if accepted.
the tour was pretty short but that's prob cuz the school is tiny. but they share facilities with the other graduate programs and those are nice. they made us wait a bit but not for too long. we had to take a 30 min, 35 question math test. not too hard. u had to take a writing test too if u took the older pcat without the problem solving section. all the other candidates were very nice. three 4th yr students came in and asked us if we had any questions before we took the math test. they didn't really share anything upfront, we had to ask before they would share anything. i thought that was weird. everyone was very nice, even the interviewer. except he was kind of serious. the whole thing took about 2 hrs. i didn't think it was too disorganized.
Arrived early. Talked with other interviewees. Asked questions of currnt P-4s. Math quiz just as described by other interviewee. Start Tour. Problem solving quiz. Finish Tour. Interview
Got there early, talked to others in my group. Asked questions of current students. Math quiz-just as previous interviewee described. Tour. Problem solving quiz-easy for me. Finish Tour. Interview with 2 faculty members. Started around 12pm and finished by 3pm
The entire process was better than I expected. I expected disorganization but that wasn't the case. You weren't required to write Howard's essay if you wrote one as part of your PCAT. The entire experience was painless and stress-free.
This school need to do more because i find it difficult to explain that I went for inteview and after 4 good months I do not know anything about the result. When I call no one answer the phone and when I email, no definte answer.
I signed up at the pharmacy office and handed them my supplemental application, money order, and official transcripts. It was a really warm day (80F) and very humid, and the AC didn't work properly so whlie we were testing (25-minute essay and 25-minute math quiz), everyone was sweating like a pigs. There was a lot of delay before the testing, so we ended up having very little time to tour the school, so we basically toured the different floors of the pharmacy building (took only about 10 minutes). The tour was lead by a 4th year student. After touring the building, we had only 5 minutes left to get to our designated interview spots. She accomodated for those who needed to fly out of DC later that afternoon by placing those interviewees to the earlier interview spots. I interviewed with Dr. Scott, who was incredibly sweet. The entire interview was very much like a conversation. He sometimes went off tangent to talk about different schools in California and the winery (I'm from California). He was really impressed that I had a lot of questions for him at the end, so really study the school and their curriculum.
We got there and signed in and waited in the office. There were a lot of people crowded in a small place so they moved us to a room upstairs that was very warm. We took a math and essay test (not bad). Then we interviewed. We never got a tour b/c our student guide was running late...so she only proctored our exams. We were led to our interviewers office where we waited outside to be called in. He was running behind and was still interviewing people from the last hours group. He was very tired and stuck in an office that had no a/c so he was uncomfortable and looked like he wanted to go home. The interview was quick but good.
The interview started a liitle late. A lady came in, tried to relax us and gave us a brief History of Howard. The student guide was very enthusiastic and answered all the questions we asked. Then we came back in and took an essay test some questions i remember are (What influence has technology had on patient care (or something)) Sorry I don't remember everything but I don't think they repeat the essay questions cause i never saw any of the essays mentioned here. Also they said they are just looking to see whether you can communicate not so much the content or length of the essay. Then we took the math test, 25 mins 30 questions; Roman numerals,logarithm,derivatives (very basic), intergrals (very basic),fractions, decimals, basic arithemetic. Then we had our one on one's with the faculty.
We come in and wait for about 30 mins until the faculty set up everything. We took a math quiz (not that bad) and a writing essay (not that bad either). They are just looking to make sure you have good writing skills, not knowledge of the topic. Afterwards we waited AGAIN for a long time and it was extremely hot in the room. Finally they start calling us for our interviews and they were in batches. I was the last one in my group to go for the interview. The Interviewer was nice, however because she knew she was behind in time, she tended to rush the interviews which I thought was bad. She didnt seem as interested in my answers as I wanted her too. She just wanted to finish and move on. The whole interview process ran so late, instead of lasting 2-3 hours, I ended up leaving 4 hours later.
The interview went pretty well! I found out on Friday night (3 days before the interview) by researching the AACP website that the probation status was lifted on February 22nd so that was great to know. The office of admissions explained that they were placed on probation because they didn’t have enough classroom and lab space to handle the 80 to 100+ students that they typically admit. So during this period they had to reduce their class size. The program was able to get some classrooms from the Med school program and sp the probation status was lifted. The accreditation that is currently in effect should be good for about 5 more years.
All the reviews prior to this one on this forum advised to expect disorganization. THEY WERE CORRECT. They admissions office personel were very pleasant but the process was EXTREMELY disorganized!!!! It didn’t bother me much since I knew to expect that. I got there very early and was able to walk the halls of the program. I walked roughly a block to get some beakfast at the cafeteria. The program is rich in history. One thing I noticed from the pictures of the graduating classes dating as far back as 1967 is that almost the whole class is Black with very few “minorities†of other races. This is definitely in tune with the Mission statement on the Programs website (MAKE SURE YOU STUDY THE WEBSITE) That is very different for me but interesting nonetheless.
We got a tour by a second year student who was very bright and personable. He is actually involved in student leadership as he is a leader of one of the academic fraternities/ societies. There were 2 timed tests/ quizzes (an essay to test grammar and writing skills under pressure and math which was pretty much a joke). we were given 4 topics to choose from like: ( What qualities are needed to be a good pharmacy student, What qualities are needed to make a good pharmacist, What challenges does the practice currently face and may face in the future ). For the math it is really basic (easier than PCAT math. Just be sure to know basic logarithm, conversiions of Kg to g, milligram and microgram, Roman numerals, basic algebra, basic derivatives and integration) Afterwards we interviewed and I think I did well. I was interviewed by one of the Associate Professors and he seemed to like what I had to say about my work experience, background and community service. The interview seemed pretty short but effective.
We should expect to hear something by the end of April.
Fifteen minutes before the interview, I checked in at the admissions office, the earlier group was taken to a holding room where ID was checked and we sat for a long time. We were again split into 2 groups, taken to a different room and wrote the essay. There were 6 essays topics to choose from. We were taken on a tour of the school, then taken to a small classroom to take the basic math quiz. Each person was set up with 2 interviewers in classrooms. The interviews ran late and my info sheet got buried at the bottom of the pile and the interviewers took a minute to figure out who I was. Overall, it wasn't all that stressful, but the interview schedule wasn't very organized.
I felt prepared, mainly due to the feedback on this website. The interview process was a little disorganized, but all in all, it wasn't too bad. I showed up, checked in, then was taken up to a waiting room full of 12-15 students. An advisor came and talked to us, gave us some background/history of the school, then current students helped out by handing out the writing and math tests. The writing portion consisted of six questions, which we got to choose one and write a short essay in 25 minutes. (Questions included topics such as "What qualities must a successful pharmacy student possess?" and "What does HIPAA stand for and what does it mean to the health profession?" and "What traits must a good pharmacist have and practice?". The math quiz is 30 questions in 25-30 minutes. Think basic PCAT math, with about 5 calc questions. Nothing too horrible. They "ran out of time" so there wasn't a real tour of the school, only a student quickly pointing out main buildings as we walked over to the faculty offices to interview. Each faculty member had a sheet of questions and took turns asking. Wasn't too stressful or intimidating, just relax and think of it more like a conversation as oppossed to an interrogation. After the interview, the day was done and it was time to go home. All in all, it took about 2.5-3 hours.
We were first given a brief history of the school and the school's mission statement. Then we were given a tour. Before we went to the interview we also took a writing test and a math test. These activities were helpful as they took my mind off the interview for a bit thus lesseing my stress level. The interview was conducted by two professors.
We reported to a conference room and waited for the recruiter. I was in a group of 9 students. The recruiter came in and gave us an overview of what to expect for the day. She also gave us some historical background on the university. Admissions criteria and financial aid were also discussed. We had the opportunity to ask questions. We were then divided into 2 groups. A 4th year student led my group on a tour. After the tour, we had to write an essay which was based on one of 6 topics given to us. The topics covered a range of areas in pharmacy, healthcare and just being a student. I'm sure everyone could easily identify with at least one of the topics. Then we took a math test which was pretty basic and had 30 questions. The last part was the interview. I had the opportunity to interview with 1 faculty member and 1 recent graduate. Overall, the few hours spent were stress free. If anything, the anticipation of the interview was the most stressful.
We had a presentation, a tour, then a essay to write (got to choose from about 6 different topics), then had a math exam (30 questions pretty basic stuff), and then had the interview.
I had talked to the dean of health sciences and the assistant dean who admits students into the program a day earlier from my interview and did not know about them. The assistant dean had ask me alot of questions as if he was interviewing me or something. He then asked my name at the end. Overall experience of the interview is decent...nothing surprising....though other interviewees I was with seemed to be very nervous. I was nervous myself. The process was slow, because staff had gone to a meeting...had to wait around for 40 minutes. Had a writing assessment...typical and easy...and then, a math assessment (basic arithmetic)...darn easy too...25 minutes each assessment. Last a quick tour around the building since it was raining that day. Best suggestion...be relax !!!!
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office should select current students who represent the program well, improve communication about interview times, provide a longer campus tour, increase staffing during the admissions process, ensure availability of interviewers, hire more staff, and improve organization to enhance the overall experience for prospective students.
choose current students that actually represent the program well. students did not seem happy.
I was invited to an interview at 10:00. NOWHERE did it mention an earlier time. I arrived 15 minutes early to find out I was actually fifteen minutes late. Another girl came when I did. We compared our letters with others and theirs had an earlier time than our letter. This was a disconcerting way to begin. When we took our math exam there was loud talking in the hall. If the objective was to see how well we handled ourselves under pressure then it was a good plan. If your object was to see what math we knew then perhaps it was not a good plan. My suggestion is to have a quiet test and be sure everyone has the same letter. Everything else was great.
Provide the best professors for the interview process as all of the interviewers were MIA the day of the interview. I would suggest they do not schedule interviews on the same day as other pharmacy seminars or events are being held because the professors seemed preoccupied.