SDN Logo
 
 

Rutgers School of Dental Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Newark, NJ

Dental Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 23% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
8.1
Above Average

Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.

Based on 417 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the candidate's motivation for pursuing dentistry, their interest in the specific school like Rutgers or UMDNJ, qualities of a good dentist, study habits, academic stress management, and their background such as shadowing experiences or extracurricular activities. Some respondents mentioned being asked about their DAT scores, interest in dentistry over medicine, and reasons for choosing dentistry as a career path. Additionally, several responses indicated that the interviews were in an MMI format, with questions on personal background, motivations for dentistry, study habits, extracurricular activities, and reasons for choosing the particular school. Respondents may have been subject to a nondisclosure agreement during these interviews as well.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at Rutgers School of Dental Medicine discussed a variety of topics related to their backgrounds, experiences, and motivations, with a mix of basic questions such as why they chose dentistry, specific questions about hobbies or travel experiences, and some personal connections like discussing family members or past jobs. It appears that the interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) based on responses, which could explain the range of questions asked and the limited disclosure due to potential nondisclosure agreements.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at Rutgers School of Dental Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including past experiences shaping their current selves, reasons for choosing dentistry over medicine, explaining low grades or DAT scores, and justifying choices in academic performance and extracurricular activities. Some respondents mentioned an MMI format or nondisclosure agreements, implying a structured interview process with standardized questions and potential confidentiality constraints.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 1 person.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as low stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by utilizing resources such as Student Doctor Network (SDN), mock interviews, reading their applications, and researching the school's website. They also practiced answers to common questions and focused on articulating their motivations for pursuing dentistry and attending the specific school.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendly and welcoming staff, faculty, and students at the school. They found the facilities to be new, up-to-date, and aesthetically pleasing, with a strong emphasis on clinical education, research opportunities, and community outreach. The interview experiences were highlighted as positive, described as conversational, relaxed, and informative, contributing to an overall positive impression of the school.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed negative impressions about the school's location in Newark, citing safety concerns and a lack of appealing surroundings. Additionally, concerns were raised about the older facilities, unenthusiastic interviewers, and the behavior of some current students, which left a negative impact on the overall experience. Suggestions included addressing safety issues, improving facilities, enhancing the interview process, and fostering a more positive and inclusive student culture.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time that the interviews would be very relaxed and stress-free, and that there was no need to be nervous or over-prepare. Suggestions included arriving early to secure speaking time with current students, being aware of parking challenges, and taking note of the laid-back nature of the interview process.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the interview process at UMDNJ to be relaxed, conversational, and informative, with interviewers emphasizing a good fit rather than trying to trick candidates. Feedback highlighted the welcoming environment, friendly faculty and students, strong clinical training, and emphasis on the importance of asking questions and being yourself during the interview.
  • Bad area but great school
  • The interview occurs first so it makes the rest of the day a lot easier to pay attention for the presentations.
  • It was my first interview, so I was so nervous. No need! Everyone was super nice.
  • The whole interview was more of a conversation.
  • I get really bad stomach pains when I'm nervous, and BOY was I nervous. There is no need to be nervous. When I got there, it was all the interviewees sitting in a conference room eating breakfast and talking with 4th year dental students. It was incredibly relaxed, and everyone was so nice and eager to help you out. Around 9am, the interviewers (usually professors) come and call your name while everyone talks and waits to be called. I went with the professor to a large room with some tables, and we just sat down and talked for around 30 mins. He even let me keep drinking my tea since I had just gotten it when he called me. Basically, just relax, it's not bad at all. There was no set list of questions he was reading from, he apparently wrote some comments from my application and used them as talking points. Make sure to address any strong points of yours if they don't ask you directly. There were a lot of opportunities where we could have ended the interview if I didn't start talking about something else. Chiiiiill, you're going to do great!

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggest offering scholarships, improving organization and cleanliness during interviews, serving lunch instead of breakfast, providing water at meals, and conducting tours before interviews for better engagement and information.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Faculty member

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average In Person
2024-25 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average In Person
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2022-23 N/A Average N/A
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Poor N/A