SDN Logo
 
 

University of Louisville School of Medicine

Louisville, KY

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 30% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview mixed with a low stress level, and felt they did well.
⭐ Overall Impressions

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as low stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
💬 Interview Questions

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools cover a wide range of topics, including reasons for pursuing medicine, strengths and weaknesses, experiences with diversity, ethical dilemmas, and reflections on healthcare issues. While some interviews were in an MMI format with nondisclosure agreements, the majority focused on personal attributes, career motivations, and views on healthcare challenges and solutions.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at University of Louisville School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including personal experiences, career choices, ethical dilemmas, and hypothetical scenarios. Notably, some respondents mentioned questions about mental health, relaxation techniques, favorite bands, and the type of medicine they envision practicing, while others highlighted inquiries about healthcare policies, stress in the medical profession, and unique health concerns facing Kentuckians.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at University of Louisville School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including ethical dilemmas like physician-assisted suicide and partial birth abortion, as well as health policy issues such as health insurance coverage for various treatments. Some respondents mentioned facing questions about strengths, weaknesses, career choices, and challenges in healthcare, while others highlighted surprise questions like choosing a cell type or allocating funds to healthcare programs. Additionally, references to MMI format interviews and nondisclosure agreements were noted, indicating a structured interview process with varied and challenging inquiries.
🤝 Interview Format and Logistics

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had a closed file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
📍 On-Site Experience

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents rank the facilities as below average.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Friends or family or with friends or family.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the area’s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

What are your comments on where you stayed?

✅ Interview Preparation and Impressions

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing their primary and secondary applications, practicing mock interviews, reading feedback on Student Doctor Network (SDN), and researching the school's website for specific information. They also familiarized themselves with common interview questions and current healthcare topics, emphasizing the importance of being genuine and relaxed during the interview process.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were consistently impressed by the friendly and welcoming atmosphere at the school, including the faculty, staff, and students. They appreciated the emphasis on collaboration, the extensive clinical opportunities available, and the state-of-the-art facilities, such as the patient simulation lab. Suggestions for improvement were not prominently mentioned.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed dissatisfaction with the outdated facilities, lack of organization and communication during the interview day, and a perceived lack of engagement or preparation from some interviewers. Suggestions for improvement include updating facilities, enhancing communication and organization, and ensuring interviewers are well-prepared and engaged during the interview process.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time that the interviews were low-stress, how much weight would be placed on their secondary application, and the importance of being familiar with the school's details. Suggestions included bringing a folio for notes, preparing questions for the interviewers, and being aware of the school's focus on research and student 'selling'.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally provided positive feedback about the laid-back and welcoming interview experience at ULSOM. They appreciated the conversational nature of the interviews, the friendly staff and students, and the emphasis on getting to know the applicants. Some suggestions included improving communication about the school's history, residency experiences, and renovations, as well as ensuring all applicants are treated fairly regardless of background or scores.
  • Overall very positive experience that gave me insights to what it would mean to be accepted there
  • This was by far the easiest and laid back interview I had. I've had 2 prior interviews (one MMI, one closed file) and ULSOM definitely found a way to ask questions to see who you are and your genuine intentions. Kudos for them being able to do that over Zoom during COVID!
  • Overall a good experience. Really welcoming school with kind students who really care about their institution. The interviews, while one was kind of stand-offish were still very low-key and welcoming. Very basic questions, don't be worried about any tricks.
  • Overall, very happy with the facilities themselves, the faculty that I was able to meet, and the students. There seem to be plenty of volunteer, research, and other extracurricular activities. Haven't received their decision yet, but would be happy to attend.
  • The interviews were so relaxed it was kind of weird. Felt like they didn't really ask me anything and spent a lot of time talking about the interviewers' career or just random stuff

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Most applicants suggested improving communication and organization during the admissions process, including clearer interview invitations, timely confirmations, and a more structured interview day. Other common suggestions included updating application software for easier document submission, offering online payment options, and providing more information about the school's attributes during the visit.