SDN Logo
 
 

University of Minnesota Duluth Medical School Interview Feedback Summary

Duluth, MN

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 24% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
8.0
Above Average

Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.

Based on 222 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include discussing grade trends, future practice plans, interest in rural or family medicine, experiences on AMCAS, personal attributes for being a doctor, and hypothetical scenarios. Many respondents also mentioned questions related to being a family practitioner in rural areas, indicating a focus on this aspect during interviews, potentially in an MMI format subject to a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at University of Minnesota Duluth Medical School discussed a wide range of topics including future career plans, ethical dilemmas, personal values, and hypothetical scenarios. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) based on the variety of questions, and respondents might have been subject to a nondisclosure agreement given the diverse and specific nature of the questions asked.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at University of Minnesota Duluth Medical School discussed a wide range of topics, from patient interaction scenarios to healthcare challenges and personal motivations for pursuing medicine. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) as some responses alluded to nondisclosure agreements, while other common themes included questions about healthcare reform, social justice, and career intentions in medicine.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as low stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing their application materials, researching the school, reading through Student Doctor Network (SDN), practicing mock interviews, and staying updated on current health issues. Many also sought advice from current students or physicians, reflected on their experiences, and practiced answering common interview questions to feel more confident and prepared.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were consistently impressed by the friendly and welcoming atmosphere at the school, including the approachable staff, faculty, and students. They appreciated the small class sizes, sense of community, and the supportive environment provided by the faculty and administration.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about feeling out of place for not being rural enough, negative interactions during interviews, limited student life activities, cramped or outdated facilities, and a strong emphasis on rural medicine to the exclusion of other interests. Suggestions included improving interview etiquette, providing more diverse extracurricular opportunities, updating facilities, and broadening the scope of medical education beyond rural practice.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the conversational nature of the interview, the importance of researching the interests of professors, the emphasis on commitment to rural and family medicine, and the significance of shadowing a rural physician. They also highlighted the small class size, the need to prepare for questions on healthcare reform, and the unexpected elements of the interview process.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally provided feedback on their interview experiences, emphasizing the importance of feeling welcomed and supported during the process. They appreciated conversational interviews, friendly staff, and the opportunity to discuss their interests and attributes, while some noted the need to be prepared to discuss specific topics like rural medicine.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggest that the admissions office should prioritize character over numbers in interviews, provide more support for local aspiring physicians, and improve communication processes by sending emails instead of paper mail and providing interviewer names in advance.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are in state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 4-6 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport (MSP)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2022-23 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Poor N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ N/A N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2016-17 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A