Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 31% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview mixed with a moderate stress level, and felt they did okay.
Most respondents were neutral about their interview.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
💬 Interview Questions ▼
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools are related to the motivations for pursuing veterinary medicine, future career goals, ethical dilemmas in animal care, and scenarios testing problem-solving skills. Many respondents mentioned being asked about their reasons for choosing veterinary medicine, where they see themselves in the future, handling challenging situations with clients, and discussing current issues in the field. Some responses indicated that the interviews were conducted in an MMI format, with participants unable to disclose specific questions due to signing nondisclosure agreements.
In fairness to the MMI I won't disclose any scenarios. What I will say is that they are asking questions to probe your own personal feelings about self management, team management, ethics - there's a wide range. I guarantee that in some way, you (the reader of this survey) have considered this scenario and how you might act. You've been preparing for it your whole life, in a sense.
Well, you know that we have your file, and we're going to see your grades. What are your study skills, and how have they changed from ungergraduate to graduate school?
What would you tell a lady who was keeping a ground hog in a small cage in her backyard if you noticed it accidentally on a large animal barn call? Say she was really attached to this animal.
What would you do if a woman came in with a dog that had obviously been used for fighting, but the woman is afraid the dog's owner will kill her if you report him, she leaves the clinic before you can do anything, what do you do....
Summarize the animal experiences you've had. -- They never asked for detail of anything I've done, I assume because I wrote in detail for the secondary application.
Students said the most interesting question asked at Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine discussed MMI format with some respondents under a nondisclosure agreement. Common questions included ethical dilemmas on euthanasia, pet ownership, and performing cosmetic procedures on animals. Other notable topics were Lab Animal Medicine, handling client financial constraints, and views on animals as property versus guardianship.
Suppose a red-tail hawk is brought in from the wild with a gsw to the wing...What would you do? If you were to keep it alive could it serve any purpose?
I was explained to about a recent event in British news involving a Vet fined for docking/cropping. I was then asked if I felt that it was ethical to perform cosmetic procedures on animals and if I would ever do them.
Suppose a child was attacked by a pit bull. The child's mother is now advocating BSL in county X, what would you say to her [to get her to change her mind]?
Students said the most difficult question asked at Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine discussed a wide range of topics including specific academic inquiries, ethical dilemmas related to animal research and pet ownership, personal goal challenges, and scenarios testing decision-making skills. Some respondents mentioned an MMI format with nondisclosure agreements, while others highlighted the challenge of recalling information across split interviews, demonstrating a mix of traditional and scenario-based questions during the interview process.
So would you say you don't possess the qualities to be a good teacher? (after I mentioned that I hadn't given much thought to becoming a teacher and that was not where my main interests were)
Is there anything else you would like us to know about you? (I say this was difficult only because the interviews were split in two, and this question was asked at the end of my 2nd interview, so I had a hard time recalling what I had said in the first interview vs. second...I probably repeated myself!).....oh and definitely my 2nd question
Probably the ethical question above, even though I had been prepared for something like that, it was hard because I felt that there was no good answer!
You've named two of the big issues in veterinary medicine, but you're still missing a big one. Do you know what it is?
Also, do you know where Pascagoula is?
A woman brings in a dog that you notice has been used for dog fighting. The dog belongs to the woman's relative who will harm her if he finds out the dog has been treated. If you report her, she will not allow you to treat the dog. If you call the authorities she may be in danger. What do you do? (*this one never seemed to end)
I know you prepared for this interview - What is one question that you had expected us to ask that we didn't? -- Unlike me, make sure you say one that you are prepared to answer!
the above question was kind of difficult...
Describe a goal that you set for yourself that you had difficulties achieving. (or something along those lines)
Something along the lines of ''What do you think about people who own too many pets?'' and ''What do you think should be done about people who can't afford healthcare for themselves much less their pets?''
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the area’s cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What are your comments on where you stayed?
No responses
✅ Interview Preparation and Impressions ▼
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Many applicants prepared for the interview by practicing with potential questions, reading up on their applications and the interview format, reviewing ethical questions, and staying updated on current events in veterinary medicine. It was common for candidates to seek feedback from various sources, such as online forums, veterinary professionals, and friends, to help them prepare effectively.
Made up potential practice questions and had someone ask me while I answered.
Honestly, I didn't really prepare. I just woke up as normal, listened to my favorite songs, ate food I really liked and told myself it would all be okay.
You really can't. I kind of just winged it with some general research to help get myself mentally prepared. Basic comms skills, ethics were some topics I focused on.
Since the questions are geared more towards who you are as a person, I thought a lot about what I was passionate about and what's going on in the world around me.
I wrote down a lot of interview questions on index cards and gave them out to friends, family members, and coworkers. I then had everyone ask me questions whenever we were together and could do so.
Read CVM, CDC, and AVMA webpages. Searched online for common interview questions and questions specific to VMRCVM. Researched A LOT of current issues and ethical obligations of veterinarians. Developed OCD.
Read over old interview questions from VA-MD and did a search online for veterinary school interview questions. Read current publications on veterinary medicine issues. Practiced with friends.
Read ''typical'' interview questions, answering probably 75 of them. Read up on current issues, AVMA policies. I would suggest going to the AVMA website and browsing the links on the main page...extremely helpful.
Applicants were positively impressed by the friendly and accommodating interview staff, state-of-the-art facilities, and engaging interview process. They appreciated the welcoming atmosphere, the equal opportunity provided by the MMI format, and the personal connections established during the interviews. Suggestions included speeding up the process and maintaining the high level of friendliness and enthusiasm displayed by the interview staff and students.
The type of questions seemed as if they were geared towards gauging our levels of empathy, problem solving, and social skills.
The facilities were top-notch. The anatomy lab is pristine, the lecture hall and building were super impressive, and while the small and large animal hospitals were older buildings, they're very well-equipped. I was also really impressed with the other interviewees - I felt that those whom I met were very fun, interesting and supportive.
How fluid the whole process was. Its 64 minutes long but it goes by fast. You are in control the whole time, and since you cannot have a wrong response, you can only have a more complete and thus correct response.
everyone was extremely friendly and enthusiastic. some of the students came over on their break and started telling us about the school and reassuring us about the interviews
The interviewers were actually really nice and they always smiled at the end of my answers and said "ok, great," which really put me at ease. Another veterinarian not involved in the interview process told me what was going to happen before it happened, and she reinforced the fact that the interviewers were not there to make you nervous, but jsut to have a conversation with you.
Joyce Massie was out front greeting everyone. A bunch of first year students came to talk to us about how they liked the school and to help calm our nerves.
Joyce and all the interviewers were EXTREMELY friendly. I connected on a personal level to almost all the interviewers to a point that I was wondering if they didn't specifically choose them for me! Oddball personal interests, television preferences, and two of them had either lived or dove in lakes in Africa where I WC fish from. Personal talk caused my interview to go over the 30min limit.
Very friendly; the admissions coordinator was on hand in the waiting room to make conservation and ease some of the tension. People were very friendly, as they have been throughout the process. Any stress was simply the inherent stress of interviewing.
Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the interview format, particularly the MMI structure and lack of feedback from interviewers. Additionally, issues related to facilities, such as outdated buildings and limited visibility during tours, were noted as areas of improvement. Suggestions included providing more transparency about the interview process, ensuring a welcoming atmosphere during tours, and addressing facility maintenance to create a more positive impression on prospective students.
The interview questions were pre-recorded. This is changing this year, as they are moving back to in-person interviews for in-state applicants.
Everything. 1. The MMI format is complete garbage. They ask unrelated questions that are *supposed* to measure abstract concepts that are *supposed* to measure ideal qualities in a veterinarian. I walked away feeling like they had no idea who I was as a person or applicant. Worse yet, they give you a score on your interview and judge you on that alone. They no longer consider the rest of your application. This is extremely foolish, as some people just don't interview well, but would make fantastic veterinarians. 2) The interviewers for the most part were extremely unfriendly. They did not smile, nor even acknowledge an answer. 3) The tour was horrible. All the facilities were closed and we didn't actually get to see much. Plus our tour guide was unenthusiastic. 4) The facilities were run down and dirty. The hallways had random furniture/boxes/occupational hazards stored in them. 5.) There was no orientation, nothing to introduce the students to the university or get them excited about attending.
no student Q&A, no financial aid discussion, did not get to meet faculty or get much of a feel of the student body, just the one student ambassador per group. I think I might have gotten more info if the schedule had not been condensed due to weather. Plus the whole thing with the new interview format--I definitely did not know what to expect.
I felt the whole thing was kind of poorly organized. I felt like a number rather than a person.
I was not too impressed with the facilities, there were hardly any windows, it was kind of a dreary place.
The Blacksburg area in general, while pretty, seems like there's not too much to do. I'm not sure if that will matter much, as I will be very busy in vet school.
The name tags wouldn't stick and my suit was held together with safety pins- literally. But, from VMR's perspective, they ran a good show and were really friendly.
My interview was at the University of Maryland because I am a MD resident, so I wish I could have driven down to BBurg to see the facilities - although I did spend my undergrad there.
Cold interviewers tried to make me feel bad for saying immediately where I had gone to undergraduate, told me that wasn't allowed to do that and the interview was over... but they were joking. Also, I didn't think the school building itself was very nice.
Nothing negative. I was a bit surprised that all classes for 1st-year students are in one room, all classes for 2nd-year students in another room, etc. Not sure if this is common practice or not.
Open file interview (at head of table with 4 interviewers around) was very stressful, and both interviews were too short. I felt like the interviewers in the open interview purposefully asked questions about your answers to get you to reach your stress point.
I really think the interviews are too short to get a good impression of the student. And there was very little time to ask your own questions, though they did make the effort.
Many applicants wished they had known that there are no right or wrong answers and to simply be unique, thoughtful, and empathetic during the interview process. Additionally, some applicants expressed a desire for more clarity on the interview format and feedback received, while others noted the importance of being prepared, staying organized, and not stressing too much.
That there were no right or wrong answers. That you needed to only be unique, thoughtful, and empathetic.
I was pretty aware of how MMI was going to work. I am still confused because they tell you to expect "little feedback" during the interviews but I actually did get feedback from most...which kind of got into my head that maybe I wasn't saying enough or that I was not filling up enough time?
That the experience would be so relaxing. Also, I planned avoid the lobby and other students but it turned out that chatting with them really helped to make me comfortable and at ease which is perhaps the most important thing for interview success.
15 minutes goes fast - make sure you know exactly what you want them to know about you because you're not going to get the chance to tell them unless you're organized and on a mission.
That I was going to come down with the stomach flu the morning of (no joke) :) I wish there had been a little bit more going on for the day - it was purely a tour and the interview. However, from what I understand, there is a revisit day/Open House in April where they have a lot more going on!
Applicants generally shared mixed feedback about the MMI format, with some finding it enjoyable and effective for evaluating applicants, while others felt it limited their ability to shine. The friendliness of the faculty and staff was widely appreciated, but concerns were raised about the interviewers' approachability and the school's organization in handling paperwork.
The school is great, location is nice and rural, faculty seem extremely approachable & helpful.
I realized that because vet school is unbelievably competitive, the interviewers would not attempt to be your friend and their would be some level of intimidation, but the degree to which some of the interviewers would go to make you feel uncomfortable was not something that made me want to consider this school as a choice if I were to be accepted.
The MMI is amazing if you have great critical thinking skills and possess the gift of gab. If you have at least those two qualities, you will not have any awkward moments and you will do just fine. All other character traits they test are about who you are so relax, go with the flow, and be your true self. Believe it or not, you're already in at this point, you just need to prove to them you are the same in person as you are on paper.
Ms. Massey has been wonderful, but I left feeling as though the school wasn't particularly interested in me. I had high hopes for VMRCVM, but I left wondering why I should bother.
Also, my tour group was enormous and my guides were ambivalent and uninformative.
I liked the MMI format as far as a way of evaluating applicants, although I think it needs to be supplemented with more background on the school (student panel? information session? small group meetings with ad com members?) It felt a little impersonal and cold, and I have the hunch the school is actually pretty warm and inviting (certainly everyone I interacted with in town was!).
Whenever I asked questions in the months after I applied, I felt that the answers were not helpful. The main adcom gave conflicting info about the format compared w/ invite and web info.
There are two 15 minute interviews with two interviewers each, one interview having read your file and one interview having not. They both go by extremely fast.
It was an enjoyable interview, good tour and great faculty who really seem focused on student concerns. I have to say the classrooms seemed sub-par and the library is very small. Blacksburg was bleak and just another college town with not much to offer. Basically, be conversational, review likely questions but don't try to memorize a script just points you want to bring up.
The interviews were two 15 min interviews (one hot, one cold) each with two interviewers. You went back to back (first open file, then cold file). I found the cold file to be more stressful!
VA still uses the "hot and cold" interviews. There was the hot team which had access to your file and the cold team which only knew your name. Each interview had 2 interviewers and lasted 15 minutes.
two interview teams each with a hot and cold room. people were very friendly and tried to put you at ease. just have fun and hopefully it will be a once in a lifetime experience!
Thought it went very well, was over quickly. I was pumped afterwards thinking that I had done my best and would surely be admitted. The cold interviewers were very sarcastic and tried to make me nervous, but I didn't let it bother me.
I thought the ''cold'' interview went much better. It was in a smaller room with only two interviewers. It was a lot less stressful than the ''hot'' interview (4 interviewers in a conference room). No real specific questions they all seemed to be hypothetical scenarios I may find myself in.
Absolutely wonderful, very friendly. I was shaking before I went in with a big board-room style table with me at the head, but it was made so comfortable. Couldn't have asked for a more pleasant experience.
I thought everyone was very friendly. Joyce Massie was in the lobby talking with students and seemed genuinely interested in meeting everyone. I thought the whole process was exactly what I thought it would be.
My poor performance was mostly due to my nervousness. I wish I had done more mock interviews. Very short, and I didn't feel like I really had any time to shine, especially after flubbing up my first question.
As I said, all along everyone from VMRCVM has been extremely friendly and helpful, which will be important if I am invited to attend there. Also, at the end of my ''cold'' interview, one of the interviewers said ''See you in the fall!'' So I have high hopes :-)
Terrible. The hot interview (where the group has seen your application) wasn't too bad, but the interviewers were so cold. They barely acknowledged my answers when I spoke. The cold interview was awful; the two interviewers argued with everything I said (I guess in an attempt to rile me up and see how I reacted) and asked me questions that I felt were rather irrelevant. I didn't feel like I was given a fair opportunity to express myself.
Also, the school lost my paperwork twice and waited until the last minute BOTH times to tell me they were missing it. Make sure you verify well in advance that they have everything they need.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggest bringing back in-person interviews, discontinuing the MMI format, providing more information about the program's culture, ensuring all materials are received before deadlines, and offering a reception or information session before interviews. They also praised the responsiveness and helpfulness of the admissions office staff, particularly highlighting Joyce Massie as being friendly and supportive.
Bringing back in-person interviews is a smart move.
I felt like I didn't really get a good sense of the program's 'culture' (how students interact together and with their professors) or many details on the academic programs.