The first interview was conversational, the second was a bit more confrontational. Overall, I think they balanced each other out. There was nothing on ethics, just questions that were aimed to make you talk about yourself. The director of admissions gave us the opportunity at the end to make sure our files were complete, which helped me because I got to give him an answer for something that the interviewers may not have been able to convey.
The school itself seems to be undergoing a lot of renovations. The campus is fairly small, but the facilities are adequate. The students seem to have made the decision to attend for reasons other than "I didn't get in anywhere else".
💬 Interview Process
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The students seemed happy. They felt that the faculty was there to *teach* rather than do research or other "stuff".
What impressed you negatively?
Not much research going on, but I think the school has a philosophy skewed more toward producing clinical physicians rather than scientific physicians.
What did you wish you had known ahead of time?
The website is very, very out of date. The library really isn't that bad, plus they've got a quiet study hall full of cubicals. The overall attitude of the school seemed to be a bit more "sink or swim" than I was expecting.