- Joined
- Apr 9, 2006
- Messages
- 5,486
- Reaction score
- 7,399
Remember prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intended to kill his patients with fentanyl. This isn't medical malpractice where if it kinda sorta seems like maybe something happened you convict, with criminal murder you need to be 100% sure
Will see how it plays out. If this is truly the standard then having a couple medical experts on the defense side say what happened was not unreasonable should be enough to create "reasonable doubt". Unfortunately I think that biases, preconceptions, pro life religious connotation and other factors will end up playing a big role in this case
.
Last edited: