SDN Logo
 
 

New England College Of Optometry Interview Feedback Summary

Boston, MA

Optometry Schools | Private For-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 23% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
8.3
Above Average

Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.

Based on 269 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools revolve around stress management, academic experiences, reasons for choosing the field of optometry, specific optometry program preferences, strengths and weaknesses, and past challenges and successes. While some responses allude to MMI format or nondisclosure agreements, the majority of questions focus on personal experiences, decision-making processes, and qualities relevant to pursuing a career in optometry.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at New England College Of Optometry discussed a variety of topics including personal attributes, motivations for optometry, resilience, future goals, and unique scenarios. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) based on responses mentioning nondisclosure agreements, while other questions focused on experiences, goals, and personal preferences.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at New England College Of Optometry discussed a wide range of topics including personal challenges, failures, compassion, empathy, academic performance, and future goals. Some respondents mentioned questions about explaining discrepancies in transcripts, handling failures, discussing personal challenges, and demonstrating empathy, while others highlighted the importance of preparation for various types of questions.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 1 person.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by utilizing resources such as Student Doctor Network (SDN), practicing with mock interviews, and researching the school's website and program details. They emphasized the importance of familiarizing themselves with potential interview questions, reviewing their application materials, and being prepared to discuss their experiences and personal statement.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness of the faculty, staff, and students, as well as the welcoming and organized atmosphere of the school. They also appreciated the beautiful campus, the strong sense of community, the emphasis on hands-on clinical experience, and the school's affiliation with multiple clinics for diverse patient exposure. Many applicants also highlighted the school's historic building, the location in Boston, and the focus on optometry as key positive aspects.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about disinterested interviewers, outdated facilities, a feeling of being oversold on the school, high cost of living, and unorganized experiences during the interview day. Suggestions included more engaging interactions during interviews, updating facilities, providing transparent information without overselling, and improving the organization of interview days.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time that the interviews would be more conversational and less stressful than anticipated. They also suggested preparing more questions for the lunch with a current student and being aware of the two different interview formats with faculty and students.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally provided positive feedback about the schools' programs, location, and the friendliness of the staff and students. Some highlighted concerns included interview experiences, cost of attendance, and the distance of clinics from campus, while emphasizing the importance of being genuine and prepared during the application process.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants generally appreciated the friendliness and organization of the admissions office but suggested improvements such as sending email confirmations for scheduled interviews, ensuring enthusiastic student tour guides, and avoiding unnecessary lectures during the application process.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 7+ hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by airplane to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent more than $500.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel is the **Westin Copley Marriott**.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2022-23 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2016-17 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A