- Joined
- May 9, 2006
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 1
just want to toss in my 2 cents...it's prolly not a good idea to use medicine strictly for the money...people's LIVES are at stake, so you'd better really give a damn.
HA123 said:I oversimplified things. You are correct, my comments were only "case reports" based on myself and friends. But in my and my friends experience, it was easier to get a job at Goldman, CSFB, Deutsche Bank etc than to get into an elite medical school. We can agree that applicants accepted to any of these institutions are exceptional. I was mainly disagreeing with the other poster's statement that it's easier to get into medical school than an elite banking or consulting firm. If that comparison is to be made, it can only involve the most selective medical schools. Obviously it would be easier to get into any medical school than to be hired by Goldman etc. Just as it would be easier to join Schmo Investments, Inc. than get into HMS.
beetlerum said:Yeah, but again, as others pointed out, the skill set is different. You can't assume that because someone got into a top med school, they'be more likely to get a job with a top bank. Maybe a little more likely. Especially if it's a top Ivy where they are concerned mostly with personality.
Also, I banking and consulting shouldn't be lumped together. Getting a job with McKinsey is hard coming from anywhere, even Harvard. True, a lot of Harvard people make it but Harvard College has a lot of amazing kids, and again, it's mostly a different skill set. Well, actually, the McK skill set is almost a supraset of the HMS skill set. Maybe slightly lower on the academics.
And of course this is just to start. Getting to 7 figures is freakin difficult in banking. A lot of top competition.
Shah_Patel_PT said:The economy is "good"....?????...i think its "recovering" is more like it......
medician said:'
...what does one tell their patients when they're working 80+ hrs/week PGY-1 dreaming of dollars bills to get through the night, slightly disappointed that they didn't make thier choice of a rich specialty?
turbomech7 said:I don't think the word "tell" was used in the sense of the intern explaining himself to the patient, but rather justification for substandard care (which is likely when all one thinks about is the money waiting for him/her at the end of training).
Panda Bear said:Whoa. Just an observation: Every resident thinks about his future salary and working conditions. Only pre-meds talk in idealistic terms but this rarely lasts beyond the first couple of years.
Being concerned about salary does not lead to substandard care as professionals have an incentive to both work and maintain a good reputation.
cdql said:So I'm going to have to print this out, laminate it, and then attach it to my forehead
This gets my vote as the funniest post of the year. It actually made me snort a noodle up my nose while I was reading it.LADoc00 said:I caught a few local family med docs in their "backroom":
Look at the happy expression of those lil guys, family med for the win.
here is the FM program director at Duke:
FEEL THE POWER!
Or how about Herbert Cornfeld in Accounts Receivables?Panda Bear said:At the bank or the accounting firm you're just "Bob in accounts receivable."
As much as I think I will enjoy being a doc, I would not expose myself to that much risk (i.e., take on that much debt,) if I didn't think there'd be a substantial $$$ payoff in the future. And being an authority and having people listen to you when you are deadly serious about helping them is important.Panda Bear said:You may call me superficial and claim that you don't care about such things but prestige and respect are pretty important.
erasable said:I apologize that this post is similar to my original post, but I am really curious about the statistics for *specialties*.
1. Which specialties are the BEST paying by *hour*?
2. Which specialties are the BEST paying by *year*?
3. Which specialties has the least hours/emergency/night calls?
4. Is there any website that list these kind of statistics?
Thanks!!!
phillyfornia said:my guess is that one of the best paying jobs by the hour is EM ($120-$150/hr)
medgator said:Procedure-based fields probably pay way more per hour than that. Derm, optho, and plastics can make a lot in very little time. Derm, especially--- most of the stuff is out-of-pocket.
hapahaole123 said:Would add pain.
There were pain people making money hand over fist in the recent past and maybe even now though I don't know how much longer the pain thing will last.
Bariatric surgeons seem to be making much dinero too.
Rads seems to do ok for now too.
Don't think dermies make that much money per se, it's more a lifestyle field. Know dermies who just make double of low end primary care.
Also if you're just into lifestyle and money consider ortho. Orthodontics that is. Can easily make 500k with no emergencies and a regular work week. Can even do dental films.
medgator said:The thing is, per hour, the derms are probably doing pretty well.... would guess that the rough work week for them is around 50 hours? So that means they're probably pulling in double money for the same hours, compared to primary care.
KentW said:The mean hours spent in practice per week in family medicine is 50.7. The mean time spent engaged in patient care or related activities is 40.2 hours per week.
Source: http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/aboutus/specialty/facts/14.html
medgator said:I wonder how that compares to derm or optho....
Techmonkey said:I'm curious as to why Moh's Derms are paid so well actually. What differentiates it from any other procedure-driven speciality?
Techmonkey said:I'm curious as to why Moh's Derms are paid so well actually. What differentiates it from any other procedure-driven speciality?
SimulD said:It's harder to get an analyst position at Goldman Sachs/Lehman/Bear Stearns then it is to get into medical school. It is harder to get a private equity postion at KKR/Dearborn Madison/GTCR then it is to get into medical school. It is harder to get an entry level consulting job at McKinsey/Bain/BCG then it is to get into medical school.
Don't kid yourself. I know these are "mere facts", but frankly speaking, if you get into medical school and go into: rads, gas, derm, rad onc, path, cards, gi, optho, ENT, urology, you will be better off then 90% of the population financially, and probably happier than most people in general. All you people who say "go get a job on wall street" probably haven't tried it.
A McKinsey job interview (I've been on 2 out of the 3 interviews) is more grueling than any medical school or residency interview you can imagine. You can't fake it, and you can't get by on legacy or affirmative action or good test scores or being a nice guy or whatever. Their standards are so high.
I matched in a competitive specialty (rad-onc) at a good medical center (Pitt), and it was much easier than getting a job at a top management consulting firm or an analyst position at an I-Bank. Trust me - I thought I had a year off coming up so I applied to these jobs, no luck whatsoever.
Unfortunately or fortunately depending on perspective, being a physician is still a heck of a way to do better than most people, financially, in the US. I can't guarantee you will like your job, but you will make more than my mom and dad combined ... in your first year out of residency.
-S
Mirror Form said:It's been shown that when you compare people with similar grades, test scores, etc.: those that go into medical school will make less than those that go into business.
Second, I know TONS of people in my undergrad who went into I-banking in NYC that didn't work anywhere near as hard as the pre-meds did, and certainly didn't have anywhere near the grades.
JackBauERfan said:But now you're comparing getting into ANY medical school with getting a position at a top banking company...Its like saying its sooo easy to "Podunk Bank Job" and very difficult to get into Harvard Med school.
HA123 said:But in my and my friends experience, it was easier to get a job at Goldman, CSFB, Deutsche Bank etc than to get into an elite medical school.
neutropenic said:Many of the guys I knew were worth $5-10 million by the time they were 30, which in medicine would be very novel (for wealth gains simply from medicine itself).
erichaj said:Why not talk about money? some of you say it's not good to talk about it. As if just because you talk about it, it is the only reason for someone to go to medical school.
People have the right to know about finances.
"Investment banking"? who says every investment banker makes lots of money? Thats like saying that every college footbal player makes it to the pros. Wall street is hard work.
SimulD said:I didn't lie, b/c i didn't have a spot yet. Plus, they make you no promises about how long they will keep you and you make no promises about how long you stay. If a client wants to hire you away, you'll leave your consulting company without batting an eye.
it makes sense that people with similar grades/test scores will get higher paying jobs outside of medicine, for obvious market-related reasons. Not surprising in the least. but, in this economy, the people getting the top jobs (GS, lehman, GTCR, mckinsey, bcg, etc.) are far more qualified then those getting into, say, Michigan State College of Human Medicine. I got into Tulane and MSU med school with a 3.0. I got neg'd on all my undergrad interviews at top companies. After med school, the top companies interviewed me b/c of my MD. They were interested in a new skill test, and weren't discouraged by my dismal undergrad GPA.
If you get a 3.5 in undergrad and a 30 on your MCAT, you will more than likely get into MD school somewhere. And then you can get a residency in a lifestyle field, if you want. With a 3.5, McK, etc. will not interview you. Promise, I've met with enough of their staff to know who they select out of undergrad. They are stellar candidates.
It's harder than you think. I'm not going on anecdotes about friends. I'm going by personal experience. I didn't have to prep for a med school/residency interview. I just acted like myself. For strategy interview, I had to meet with current staff and practice cases, read about cases on my own, learn about different industries, and hold it together in front of a higher-up.
-S
ChiliPalmer said:To some extent, I agree with this. You need to know what you can expect to make when you are working. To be indifferent to this information is foolish. It's like the social worker who, with tens of thousands of dollars in undergraduate debt, assumes more debt to get a graduate degree in social work, only to make $40,000 as a social worker. It's your own damn fault if you don't put the time in to make sure your investment of time and money will have adequate tangible benefits.
ckyuen said:Oh by the way per general surgery is the way to go, look at related post 600k for a job in nevada.
meddog1 said:Maybe, but a 3.5 earned in an undergrad business curriculum is a joke compared to a 3.5 earned doing a hardcore science curriculum.
EUA said:Really? Did you do both?
SimulD said:It's harder to get an analyst position at Goldman Sachs/Lehman/Bear Stearns then it is to get into medical school. It is harder to get a private equity postion at KKR/Dearborn Madison/GTCR then it is to get into medical school. It is harder to get an entry level consulting job at McKinsey/Bain/BCG then it is to get into medical school.
Don't kid yourself. I know these are "mere facts", but frankly speaking, if you get into medical school and go into: rads, gas, derm, rad onc, path, cards, gi, optho, ENT, urology, you will be better off then 90% of the population financially, and probably happier than most people in general. All you people who say "go get a job on wall street" probably haven't tried it.
A McKinsey job interview (I've been on 2 out of the 3 interviews) is more grueling than any medical school or residency interview you can imagine. You can't fake it, and you can't get by on legacy or affirmative action or good test scores or being a nice guy or whatever. Their standards are so high.
I matched in a competitive specialty (rad-onc) at a good medical center (Pitt), and it was much easier than getting a job at a top management consulting firm or an analyst position at an I-Bank. Trust me - I thought I had a year off coming up so I applied to these jobs, no luck whatsoever.
Unfortunately or fortunately depending on perspective, being a physician is still a heck of a way to do better than most people, financially, in the US. I can't guarantee you will like your job, but you will make more than my mom and dad combined ... in your first year out of residency.
-S
Panda Bear said:I confess that I have only the vaguest notion what an investment banker does. In fact, when I travel, I am mystified at what exactly all of those people are doing with their laptops and cordless headsets (except for that kid I saw surfing porn, of course).
No real point. Just that I agree wholeheartedly with the poster who pointed out that a different skill set is required in the business world. I am a decent Doctor. I would blow as a banker. I would hate to push numbers around and go to meetings for a living.
On another note, you get a lot more respect as a physician than you would as a businessman. When I walk into the patient's room, invariably the family stand up and become quiet, listening respectfully to what I have to say. At the bank or the accounting firm you're just "Bob in accounts receivable."
This is because the skill-set required of a physician involves being an authority figure on life or death issues.
You may call me superficial and claim that you don't care about such things but prestige and respect are pretty important.
Techmonkey said:Well imho if you break it down math-wise, we all have job-based income and income obtained from investment.
At some point income from one's investments starts to supercede job-based income.
Although the original poster asked for the best PAYING specialty, it's possible that what he really wanted to know was which specialty would put him in the most financially advantageous position. That depends largely on how well you use your time. If you felt that having more time to invest would make you a greater total income then choose a specialty with less hours.
The best way to be rich is to be financially savvy/disciplined. I derive great emotional satisfaction from efficacious treatment but intellectually I find investment/business to be more interesting. Hence I'm inclined towards a specialty that allows me the hours to spend reading business/investment.
Nope. But a lot of my buddies in undergrad were business majors and I looked through their texts, etc. Didn't look intimidating by any means. Suposedly "Micro Economics" is their killer course. Some complex formulas with it, but appeared very doable.EUA said:Really? Did you do both?
novacek88 said:Back to the original question: If I had to rank the top 10 following fields in terms of what a physician earns in private practice after working for several years, here is my rankings. This is based on my extensive experience with physicians in general through family, friends and associates.
1. Plastic Surgery
2. Neurosurgery (includes Ortho Spine)
3. Cardiology (both interventional and non-interventional)
4. Maternal-Fetal OBGYN specialists
5. Opthalmology
6. Orthopedic Surgeons
7. Pain Medicine
8. Radonc
9. GI tied with Urology
10. Radiology
Dermatology is more of a lifestyle oriented field. And Derm has the potential to earn much more but most dermatologists become used to their lifestyle and thus elect not to work more.
GI tied with Urology
Are you comparing a doctor to a bank teller?? I see your point about medicine, but I think real bankers are respected,too.