Corrections Policy

Purpose

SDN Review is committed to accuracy, transparency, and integrity in medical education reporting. When errors are identified in our content, we act promptly to correct them in a way that preserves the scholarly record and maintains reader trust. Our corrections and retractions policy follows the principles set forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Minor Errors

  • Definition: Typographical mistakes, formatting inconsistencies, or minor language edits that do not alter the scientific or educational meaning of the article.
  • Action: Corrected silently in the online version. A formal notice is not required.

Substantive Errors

  • Definition: Errors that may affect the understanding, interpretation, or credibility of the article but do not invalidate its overall conclusions.
  • Action: A Correction Notice is issued.
    • The notice is clearly labeled “Correction,” dated, and linked to the original article.
    • The corrected article remains available, with the correction notice serving as part of the permanent record.

Retractions

  • Definition: Published work that is found to be unreliable due to misconduct (e.g., plagiarism, data fabrication, unethical practices) or honest error that invalidates the findings.
  • Action: A Retraction Notice is issued.
    • Retractions are clearly identified, dated, and linked to the original article.
    • The original article remains accessible but is watermarked “Retracted” to preserve the scholarly record.
  • Retractions are reserved for cases where corrections are insufficient.

Editorial Expressions of Concern

  • Definition: Situations where a serious issue has been raised, but there is insufficient evidence to warrant a correction or retraction (e.g., ongoing investigation).
  • Action: An Expression of Concern may be published, linked to the article, and updated once an outcome is reached.

Responsibility for Reporting Errors

  • Authors: Must promptly inform the editorial office if they discover an error in their published work.
  • Readers and Reviewers: Are encouraged to notify the editorial team if they identify potential errors.
  • Editors: Are responsible for investigating all concerns in line with COPE flowcharts and recommendations.

Transparency and Permanence

  • All corrections, retractions, and editorial notices remain part of the permanent scholarly record.
  • Notices include the reason for the change and who initiated it (author, editor, reader, or third party).
  • Dates of correction or retraction are clearly indicated.
  • Learn more by reviewing our Actionable Feedback Policy

Contact

To report an error or concern, please contact the editorial team at [email protected]. All reports are handled confidentially and in accordance with COPE guidelines.

Application Timeline Current phase: Interviews (Oct - Mar) 📱 Track your Timeline:  App Store  |  Google Play

Current phase of the application cycle.

  1. Early Prep
  2. Primary Application
  3. Secondaries
  4. Interviews
  5. Decisions
You are viewing information for the Interviews phase of the application timeline.