Menu Icon Search
Close Search

Residency Applicants Beware! Make Sure You Understand the Match Participation Agreement

Created February 15, 2017 by James P. Holloway

With Match Week approaching, this is an exciting and hectic time. As you prepare for the next phase of your medical career, it is also important to understand legal issues involved in the Match®, administered by the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP)®. As part of the online enrollment process for the Match, residents accept the NRMP’s Match Participation Agreement (MPA). Residents cannot register for the Match unless they accept the MPA. The MPA is a binding contract exceeding 30 pages. Many residents never read the MPA during the online enrollment process. Others may skim the MPA, but not read the terms carefully. Lurking within the MPA, however, are numerous restrictions on what residents may do before, during, and after Match Week. Applicants who fail to comply with those restrictions in the MPA may commit a match violation, which could lead to substantial penalties and adverse consequences for your medical career. Therefore, it is essential to be aware of your obligations under the MPA and to assure your compliance with the MPA.

Many Ways to Commit a Match Violation

The MPA prohibits a variety of actions by residents. For example, the MPA restricts residents from backing out of their Match commitment. While the MPA allows a resident to request the NRMP for a waiver releasing the resident from a Match or SOAP® position, the resident may not leave his/her residency program or communicate with any other residency program unless and until the NRMP grants the waiver request. In addition, the MPA prohibits residents from withdrawing from the Match after the rank order list certification deadline, and even prohibits residents from contacting other programs after the rank order list certification deadline. Residents may not contact programs to which they have applied until after the Match results are announced. Furthermore, the MPA prohibits residents from disclosing any confidential Match information contained in the NRMP’s “R3”® system. If a resident shares his/her NRMP code number or password with a person who is not registered for the Match, that is also a Match violation. Moreover, residents who provide false, misleading, or incomplete information to residency programs during the Match process – including in applications, letters of reference, or interviews – commit a Match violation. These are only some of the ways to violate the MPA. And the MPA has a “catch all” provision that allows the NRMP to declare a Match violation if residents fail to “conduct their affairs in an ethical and professionally responsible manner.” That provision allows the NRMP to declare that a wide variety of conduct amounts to a Match violation. Many residents report they were unaware of the restrictions contained in the MPA.

The Process for Challenging Match Violations

The MPA gives the NRMP the power to declare that a resident has committed a Match violation. The MPA allows a resident to challenge the NRMP’s decision imposing punishment for a Match violation, but only by the resident initiating arbitration that is strictly controlled by the MPA and by the NRMP. The arbitration must be conducted in the NRMP’s office in Washington, DC, and under the rules of the American Arbitration Association (AAA). AAA arbitration fees can amount to nearly $10,000. If the resident wants a lawyer to assist with the arbitration, the cost can be substantially more. Many residents simply cannot afford arbitration, even if the NRMP’s punishment could be reversed by arbitration. The arbitration is conducted by one arbitrator. The arbitrator must uphold the NRMP’s decision of a Match violation unless the resident presents “clear and convincing evidence” that the NRMP’s decision is wrong. The burden of proof is on the resident, not on the NRMP. The arbitrator’s decision is final and not appealable, even if the decision is wrong. Residents have no right to go to court and no right to have a jury hear their side. Residents are often unaware these procedural protections were waived in the MPA.

Harsh Punishment for Match Violations

If residents do not challenge the NRMP’s decision that a Match violation was committed, or if residents fail to reverse the NRMP decision in arbitration, there are several potentially onerous consequences for residents. The NRMP can withdraw residents from the Match before they are even matched to a residency program. In addition, the NRMP can prohibit residents from participating in future matches – in some cases, permanently. If a resident has matched to a program, the NRMP can prohibit a resident from beginning the program or, if he/she already started the program, the NRMP may suspend the resident’s participation in the program. All of these punishments delay residents from completing their residency training.

One additional consideration: if the NRMP’s punishment is not challenged, or if it’s upheld in arbitration, the NRMP may list residents as “Match violators” in the NRMP’s records. Residents may be required to disclose the NRMP’s disciplinary action in future applications for employment, medical licenses or board certifications. Being tainted by ethical violations can severely damage your professional reputation and limit future opportunities. Thus, Match violations may impede your medical career. Many residents report that they were completely unaware of those potential consequences when they accepted the MPA.

Takeaways for Future Residents

The MPA contains many detailed rules. Those rules are binding on residents who accept the MPA. If the NRMP decides that a Match violation has been committed, it is difficult and expensive to fight the NRMP. And violating the MPA may lead to the disruption of residency training, create severe financial burdens, and adversely impact a resident’s medical career. Therefore, it is essential to understand your obligations under the MPA and to avoid a Match violation.

About the Author
James P. Holloway is a Shareholder in the Health Law Group at Baker Donelson, resident in the Washington, DC office. If you have questions, he can be contacted at (202) 326-5045 or [email protected].

// Share //

// Recent Articles //

  • Putting the Anxiety Cart Before the Horse

  • Posted March 24, 2018 by The Short Coat Podcast
  • Anxiety about your competitive specialty ambitions in your first year isn’t worth it. Listener Luis wrote in expressing his anxiety that his med school–which he’ll begin attending this fall–doesn’t have the prestige or programs to support his desire for a competitive specialty like ophthalmology. If that’s the case, he wondered, what can he do to increase...VIEW >
  • How to Work with a Recruiter to Find a Job

  • Posted March 23, 2018 by Monya De, MD MPH
  • In your second or third year of residency or fellowship, your smartphone will suddenly start buzzing at all hours of the work day. When you answer, a hyperactive-sounding millennial will chirp at warp speed: “HiDr[yourname]! IjustwantedtoknowyouravailabilitycauseIhaveanamazingopportunity60milesfromChattanooga….” This has the potential to happen 20 times per day, while you are trying to study for your in-service...VIEW >
changing your mind
  • Changing Your Mind—And Your Specialty

  • Posted March 22, 2018 by Brent Schnipke
  • I’ve written about choosing a medical specialty throughout the third and even fourth years of medical school, but further discussion is warranted regarding the students who don’t choose a specialty in this “typical” timeframe. It is worth mentioning first of all: many people change their minds for many different reasons. I continue to be impressed...VIEW >
  • Entering Third Year With An Open Mind

  • Posted March 20, 2018 by Adelle
  • I went into my third year with a somewhat open mind in terms of what I thought I liked and what I thought I wanted to do for the next 35 years or so of my life. Internal medicine interested me because you had to know so much about, well, so much. I felt like...VIEW >
  • Should You Consider Romance When Selecting a Med School?

  • Posted March 17, 2018 by The Short Coat Podcast
  • Med school can test a relationship. Lauren wrote in to ask us to what extent her love life should play a role in her selection of a medical school, and how we thought med school challenges relationships. Gabe Conely, Joyce Wahba, Claire Casteneda, and new host Brendan George discussed their perspective on how med school can...VIEW >

// Forums //